Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One nation 'under God'
Washington Times ^ | 1/02/04 | Pat Boone

Posted on 01/02/2004 12:54:39 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:11:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Back in 1954, a skinny 20-year-old kid from Nashville was on the brink of a dream come true a career in entertainment and music.

Even then, he knew something that still holds true 50 years later: that a little faith in God can be a very big thing. I know this for a fact, because I'm that skinny kid.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: patboone; undergod

1 posted on 01/02/2004 12:54:39 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Regarding the judges who declared the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional:

"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says 'Under God'. Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean sh*t."

Stay Safe Kat......

2 posted on 01/02/2004 12:59:51 AM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
What greater authority do we need!!!

The courts have ruled American Citizens are wrong in acknowledging the source of their sacred freedoms.

The courts have ruled we've wrongly believed American freedoms of religion, speech and public assembly were bestowed on each of us by our Creator.

The courts have ruled God's Law is subordinate to government law. Thus, our pledge wrongly asserts we are "....one nation, under God....".

Taking a page from President Andrew Jackson....the courts have ruled......"....now let them enforce it."

Traitors in black robes are but one segment of the enemy within gaveling down our freedoms and national sovereignty through the dictatorial tyranny of court decree.

3 posted on 01/02/2004 2:32:24 AM PST by Robert Drobot (God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
"Traitors in black robes are but one segment of the enemy within gaveling down our freedoms and national sovereignty through the dictatorial tyranny of court decree."

Hear, hear!

4 posted on 01/02/2004 3:26:01 AM PST by G.Mason ( Oh Hillary? ....... GWB is waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
"Guess that means when you were sworn in with your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated, 'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional, therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't mean sh*t."

Interesting thing I am finding out in preparing my federal suit against the State of Texas for civil rights violations is that a many of judges do NOT take their oaths. Meaning that they simply don't believe they are bound by the restrictions of the Constitution.

Want to see something regarding the judiciary that will make you want to scream? Check out this link to see how it is determined who will get cases heard before the Texas Supreme court. http://www.justiceatstake.org/partnerViewer.asp?breadCrumb=9,226

This is the reason I had to take my case to the Federal Court. The cases that are allowed to be heard before the Texas Supreme Court are based on contributions to the judges campaign accounts. If you or your attorney contribute to the justice's campaigns, you have a much greater chance of having your case heard before the Texas Supreme Court.

5 posted on 01/02/2004 4:50:03 AM PST by texgal (end no-fault divorce laws and return DUE PROCESS to our citizens))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
So let me see--the Pledge was adopted by Presidential decree
in 1892--the same year that the S.Ct. decided "...this is
a Christian nation."Church of the Holy trinity v. the United States,Feb.29,1892After several other legal amendments to the pledge in 1954 President "Ike" legally
amendment the pledge to conform with other historic artifacts(the national anthem, national motto, national heritage etc.) Now an unjust Judge uses the fraud perpetrated in 1947(Everson v. Board of Education) And a
construct of the Court "the Lemon test" devised in 1974?
to find what was legal in 1954 and since now "unconstitutional"? If we accept we are not Free.
7 posted on 01/02/2004 6:45:42 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texgal
Going to have to look into that. Thanks for the tip. The quote was from some comedian I believe so I just posted it here as it shows the insanity upon us by "just" the judicial system..........

Stay safe and a Merry 2004 !!

8 posted on 01/02/2004 9:13:56 AM PST by Squantos (Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson