Israel's Right to the Land

Arutz Sheva ^ | 1-4-04 | Lee Underwood

[SJackson]

“For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest.” Isaiah 62:1

There are currently a vast number of wars ("international conflicts") being waged in the world today. The number varies according to the source and its definition of "war" and "conflict". The type of "conflicts" range from terrorist organizations fighting against sovereign governments to nations warring against nations to spiritual battles being waged around the globe. The curious aspect in all of this is that the war in Israel seems to be the one event that causes most of the world to feel threatened.

Because of many different beliefs and attitudes regarding, among other things, peace and freedom, the situation in Israel tends to become quite convoluted. Misunderstandings regarding the reasons for the fighting abound, even among followers of the G-d of Israel. Also involved are the agendas, hidden and otherwise, of many of the key players involved.

In its simplest terms, the "conflict" in Israel is being waged by those who are fighting (whether intentionally or not) against the G-d of Israel, the Creator of the universe. It is a battle, for the most part, between those of faith who believe the promises G-d made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and those who, for whatever reasons, would prefer that Israel (i.e., the Jews) did not live on the land bordered by the Nile and Euphrates Rivers and the Mediterranean Sea and the wilderness of Jordan. The faithful in Israel are obeying a direct commandment from G-d ("inhabit the land"). Those, on the other hand, who are fighting against G-d (whether intentionally or not) are trying to remove the Jewish people from the land given to them by G-d, especially Judea and Samaria - the very heart of Israel.

The basic reason for wanting Jews out of the land of Israel is quite simple when looked at from a spiritual viewpoint. The existence of the Jewish people in the land of Israel, after 2,000 years of dispersion, proves beyond a doubt that the G-d of Israel does exist and that man will one day have to give an account of his deeds before Him; that man's autonomous reign on this earth is soon coming to an end.

We could look at the historical aspect of the situation and try to determine whether Israel actually has a right to live in the land or if it really does belong to the 'Palestinians'. However, this is exactly what is happening now and the facts become very easily distorted when mingled with bold lies. The question many people ask is "Whose history do we believe, the Israelis or the 'Palestinians'?"

Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels' statement, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, then people will eventually come to believe it," has certainly come to life in the current situation. Then whose statements do we believe?

For those who worship the G-d of Israel, there is only one truth: the word of G-d itself. But what exactly did G-d say regarding Israel? Does it still hold true today, even after Israel's dispersion from the land 2,000 years ago? Does G-d want to divide the land of Israel and give a portion of it to the 'Palestinians' - or anybody else - besides the Jewish people? The answers, fortunately, are found in the Scriptures - G-d's written word.

G-d's Eternal Covenant with Israel

Approximately 4,000 years ago, G-d made a covenant with Abraham to give him and his descendants the land of Canaan, located "from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates." (Genesis 15:18) This covenant was later restated to Isaac (Genesis 26.2-5) and to Jacob (Genesis 28.13; 35.12). Eventually, G-d would make this same covenant with the entire house of Israel, as a nation:

"For My angel will go before you and bring you in to the land of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Canaanites, the Hivites and the Jebusites; and I will completely destroy them.... And I will fix your boundary from the Red Sea to the sea of the Philistines, and from the wilderness to the River Euphrates; for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you will drive them out before you." (Exodus 23.23,31).

G-d also declared that Israel would be His "own possession among all the peoples." The requirements of Israel for this covenant is to "obey My [G-d's] voice and keep My covenant." (Exodus 19:5) Because of this, many people mistakenly believe that, because Israel disobeyed G-d, He removed them from the land permanently. They say that Israel no longer has a valid claim to the land, according to G-d's word. Some even go so far as to say that G-d has cast off His people permanently. However, Scripture does not bear this out. In fact, it states just the opposite.

G-d was very specific regarding what would happen to Israel if they obeyed Him and the resulting punishment if they failed to obey Him ("the blessings and the curses"). The details are given in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28. The ultimate penalty for continuing to disobey G-d was removal from the land of promise (Leviticus 26.33). Yet, there was always the promise of restoration: "Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them, nor will I so abhor them as to destroy them, breaking My covenant with them; for I am the L-rd their G-d." (Leviticus 26:44; see also Jeremiah 31.35-37; Lamentations 4.22; Micah 7.18-20) G-d never declared that He would utterly abandon the Jewish people: "'Yet even in those days', declares the L-rd, 'I will not make you a complete destruction.'" (Jeremiah 5:18; see also Amos 9.8) G-d, instead, promised that a remnant of Israel would return to the land that He promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Isaiah 11.11-14; 43.5-6; Zephaniah 3.14-20). Notice that G-d is speaking of Israel - the Jewish people - returning to the land, not some other vessel.

Dividing the Land of Israel

So we come back to one of our original questions: Does G-d want to divide the land of Israel and give a portion of it to the 'Palestinians' - or anybody else - besides the Jewish people? Aside from the Scriptures listed above, there are many more detailing G-d's promise of the restoration of the Jewish people to the land of Israel. Is it possible, then, that G-d would want to share the land with other nations? G-d is very concerned about His land, especially Judea and Samaria. He is also concerned for His holy city Jerusalem. G-d spoke of the judgment of the nations for doing this very thing: "I will gather all the nations, and bring them down to the valley of Jehoshaphat. Then I will enter into judgment with them there on behalf of My people and My inheritance, Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations; and they have divided up My land." (Joel 3:2)

Many individuals and organizations approve of the idea of the creation of a 'Palestinian' state, as long as it is not headed by a terrorist organization. Their claim is that the 'Palestinian people' need a place to live also. While we could argue the actual existence of a 'Palestinian people', we need to look back at the Scriptures for the correct Biblical position. G-d commanded Israel 3,500 years ago to remove the pagan nations from the land of Israel and dwell in it. G-d has never changed nor lifted this command. Many in Israel are asking that the 'Palestinians' leave peacefully. There are plenty of places for them to go. Whatever they do, it is not Israel's responsibility to provide a place for them to live. Israel's command from G-d is to remove the enemy from their midst and dwell in the land.

The issue then of whether to divide Israel or not becomes clear. The land bordered by the Nile and Euphrates Rivers and the Mediterranean Sea and the wilderness of Jordan belongs to G-d, Who, in turn, gave it to the Jewish people for an eternal possession. It cannot be shared nor given away. G-d gave Israel a clear command regarding making covenants with their enemies: "and when the L-rd your G-d shall deliver them before you, and you shall defeat them, then you shall utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them." (Deuteronomy 7:2)

The basic answer to Israel's problem with the 'Palestinians' - and the nations of the world - is to trust G-d, not man.

Many Christians are asking what they can do to help Israel. As Christians, it is our job to encourage Israel to believe the promises G-d made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. We must encourage them to return to Israel and build up the land. We must pray and intercede for them to be strong and withstand the pressures of the nations. It is G-d alone they must fear, not man: "In G-d I have put my trust, I shall not be afraid. What can man do to me?" (Psalm 56:11) We are the watchmen of Israel. Let us take our job seriously.

"For Zion's sake I will not keep silent, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not keep quiet, until her righteousness goes forth like brightness, and her salvation like a torch that is burning.... On your walls, O Jerusalem, I have appointed watchmen; all day and all night they will never keep silent. You who remind the L-rd, take no rest for yourselves; and give Him no rest until He establishes and makes Jerusalem a praise in the earth." (Isaiah 62:1,6-7)

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

[Support Free Republic]

If you can make a donation to Free Republic, then don't make others carry your water!

[M Kehoe]

You are very busy today.

Happy New Year.

5.56mm

[Phil V.]

BINGO! . . . I read the title of this thread, pondered briefly the source and then settled on "Arutz Sheva" as the most likely propigator of the notion that GOD bestowed OWNERSHIP . . . BINGO . . . Arutz Sheva.

It is a battle, for the most part, between those of faith who believe the promises G-d made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and those who, for whatever reasons, would prefer that Israel (i.e., the Jews) did not live on the land bordered by the Nile and Euphrates Rivers and the Mediterranean Sea and the wilderness of Jordan.

Religions are fine things to practice but bloody things to implement.

There is little separation between the blasphemy of Mohammed Atta and the blasphemy of Arutz Sheva.

[Mr. Mojo]

There is little separation between the blasphemy of Mohammed Atta and the blasphemy of Arutz Sheva.

Please tell me you didn't just say that.

[The Mayor]

Bump for later read..

[Phil V.]

I didn't say that.

I posted that.

[Mr. Mojo]

You're insane.

[Phil V.]

No.

I'm looking at the end product of implementing and securing the lands defined as Israel within this article.

To be a proponent of of securing the boundaries defined in this article as Israeli boundaries IS insane.

[D Rider]

My particular favorite, at this time, is Ezekial 36. Which is a prophecy addressed to the mountains of Israel. Read it, then take a look at a topo map. Then compare it to a map that shows the west bank.

...Can you say fireworks?

[SJackson]

You know perfectly well no political party in Israel with enough support (actually none) proposes annexation of everything from

Nile and Euphrates Rivers and the Mediterranean Sea and the wilderness of Jordan. No party party with meaningful support supports annexation to the Jordan river and expulsion of the arab population, as you frequently imply.

Your comment is pure propaganda.

[D Rider]

The boundary's in this post have never been under any sort of control by Israel, with the exception of possibly Solomon.

One common belief is that it will take the establishent of the messianic kingdom for Israel to achieve those boundarys. At which point, who will argue with G_d?

[Phil V.]

You know perfectly well no political party in Israel with enough support (actually none) proposes annexation . . .

Correct.

I have in no way suggested or implied that Arutz Shiva speaks for the government of Israel. But I have, in short, characterized Arutz Shiva's article as blasphemous.

[Phil V.]

Shiva

Sheva

[Alouette]

I have, in short, characterized Arutz Shiva's article as blasphemous.

You characterize a great many things as "blasphemous" even then they in fact are not so.

Disagreeing with Phil Almighty's leftist ideology is not blasphemy, but Phil setting himself higher than G-D is.

[GladesGuru]

"At which point, who will argue with G_d?"


That's an easy one - ACLU will be in court against Him in a New Yawk moment.

If spectators are allowed, I'd like to be there when the Defendant opens.

[thatdewd]

BTTT

[SF South Park Republican]

Hmmm - let me see if I have understood this correctly: G-d has given half of Egypt and Iraq, all of Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon, and presumably a third of Sudan, Saudi Arabia, and all of Kuwait, to the Jewish people, and all of the current inhabitants of these places as well as all members of non-Jewish religions, atheists, and agnostics of the world are supposed accede to this divine land grant?

[Nix 2]

Ain't ya never seen a map of original Israel, before civil war? Nope. Didn't think so. But Philly swears he has the answer, the one and only answer, to something about which he remains, (since I've known him,)utterly ignorant and unabashedly clueless. But he never lets that stop him....

Phil---5
Real knowledge---0