To: hchutch
Of course the problem is the welfare State, but we'd rather point to the symptoms of the disease and call them the cause, than address the actual disease itself.
97 posted on
01/07/2004 6:17:38 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: hchutch; RedBloodedAmerican; William Wallace; sinkspur; Howlin; CWOJackson
ROTFLMAO!!!
I was just slumming over at LP, and the paranoia is unbelievable!
Not only is every new LePer suspected of being me if they don 't tow the "hate FR" line, but Neil, the moderator for that paragon of First Amendment rights known as "Liberty Post", is banning accounts for the crime of "suspicion of being Luis".
This is really great!!!!
Hey Freddy!!
"Then Ill be aroun in the dark. Ill be everwhere - wherever you look. Wherever theys a fight so hungry people can eat, Ill be there. Wherever theys a cop beatin up a guy, Ill be there. If Casy knowed, why, Ill be in the way guys yell when theyre mad an - Ill be in the way kids laugh when theyre hungry an they know suppers ready. An when our folks eat the stuff they raise an live in the houses they build - why, Ill be there. See?" -- Steinbeck
98 posted on
01/07/2004 7:28:44 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Again, the more people who rely on a program, the harder it is to get rid of it.
Immigrants did not create welfare, nor did they create racial preferences, or multiculturalism.
But can anyone really deny that MASS immigration strengthens all three of those things?
Reducing immigration would make it easier to deal with each, because the base of people who benefit from those policies would cease to grow ( at least as rapidly as it is now), thus lessening the power of the interest groups and politicians who make sure these policies remain in place.
111 posted on
01/07/2004 2:49:16 PM PST by
Aetius
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson