Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
The canal could be defended by the US...we have the technological capability presuming we had the control of enough land, air and sea space around it. We could have pressed for that.

Instead, we have chosen not to, and in fact have gone the other way.

As a result, others, particularly the Chinese, are in a position now to militarily hurt us by denying it to us. That is all.

40 posted on 03/08/2004 11:39:49 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head
"The canal could be defended by the US..."

I am not sure I agree. The canal is so fragile mechanically (locks, dams) that it is hard to conceive of china not finding some way to do damage if that was their desire no matter what sort of hardware we had in the region. Heck, a traffic route runs 50-100 yards from the northeast chamber of Pedro Miguel. A road runs THROUGH gatun lock's north chamber.

"particularly the Chinese, are in a position now to militarily hurt us by denying it to us. That is all."

Agreed on the status-quo.
41 posted on 03/08/2004 11:47:47 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson