To: Devil_Anse; All
I don't think that the Prosecution will appeal. IMO, I think they just want to get on with it...only argued against the change of venue as a formality...of course they want to try it in their own county. And if they DON'T appeal it, I think they would be making the statement that they are ready with a solid case against Snott...wherever it may be tried.
With that said, I sure don't want to see it moved to LA county. After the abominable OJ verdict, I sure don't want trust putting such an important, high profile case in the hands of those idiots again. If MG wants to go south...go to San Diego. Those jurors knew what to do with Westerfield, despite the Feldman's unethical conduct and the way they tried to vilify the Van Dams because of their lifestyle and drug use.
But I think because the Defense suggested Alameda as an acceptable place, that is my wager...Alameda County.
Bets, anyone?
58 posted on
01/08/2004 3:13:12 PM PST by
Jackie-O
(Have you pulled out the electric blanket yet??)
To: Jackie-O
in the hands of those idiots again AMEN!!! With all due respect to the smart L.A. people on this forum, the rest of the country lost respect for L.A. when we saw some of its dumbest citizens, and America's dumbest verdict, paraded for everyone to see! The DEFENSE suggested Alameda? Then I don't trust Alameda! How about San Jose? Or, San Joaquin (is that a county out there)?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson