"TREASON? What the hell, let's each one of us try to outshout the other and be more outrageous than the one before. "
What more, let's all attack Bush and yell that he is committing "treason" and let's elect a Bin Laden and Saddam-loving Democrat instead, that'll show Bush.
Wait, we already did that, when the outraged conservatives elected Clinton, to punish Bush I. Guess who really got punished -- the country and all of us.
But let's do it again!
Bush isn't a good enough conservative, in the view of some, so let's elect Dean.
Clinton, other then selling defence secrets to China, wasn't so bad. He pretty much didn't do anything except have a good time in the oval office. I much prefer a do nothing president to a advance the liberal agenda president. And Bush is an advance the liberal agenda president, he reminds me of LBJ (spit). And that's not good. So it matter very little if a D or an R sits in the white house since both are globalist, socialist, new world order, big spending liberals.
I hate to say it but in hide sight the Clinton years are starting to look better than Bush years.
posted on 01/10/2004 3:25:34 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson