[FairOpinion]

"TREASON? What the hell, let's each one of us try to outshout the other and be more outrageous than the one before. "

==

What more, let's all attack Bush and yell that he is committing "treason" and let's elect a Bin Laden and Saddam-loving Democrat instead, that'll show Bush.

Wait, we already did that, when the outraged conservatives elected Clinton, to punish Bush I. Guess who really got punished -- the country and all of us.

But let's do it again!

Bush isn't a good enough conservative, in the view of some, so let's elect Dean.

Great logic!

(/sarcasm)

[jpsb]

Clinton, other then selling defence secrets to China, wasn't so bad. He pretty much didn't do anything except have a good time in the oval office. I much prefer a do nothing president to a advance the liberal agenda president. And Bush is an advance the liberal agenda president, he reminds me of LBJ (spit). And that's not good. So it matter very little if a D or an R sits in the white house since both are globalist, socialist, new world order, big spending liberals.

I hate to say it but in hide sight the Clinton years are starting to look better than Bush years.