Replies

This policy anouncement is less about votes and more about the "haromonization" of mexico and the United States. YOu see the Summit of the Americas is next week. You will not see the text of president' bush's speech run here, but he will give a speech that describes how the United States is going to implement the policy determined by the 1998 Summit of the Americans on migrant workers. In that policy statement, business interests and nongovernmental agencies established that what they call "migrant" (read illegal) workers should be able to keep any social security money paid while working in the united states and that it was important that the flow of remittances ( the money the illegals send out of country) be maintained at a high level as possible.

Now Bush will speak next week and tell the members of the summit conference that the social security is a done deal and that the open border to illegals will insure that remittance money will keep flowing South.

In case you didn't know, remittance is globalist speak for wealth redistribution through foreign aid. Yes the remittance is foreign aid and it is so thoroughly relied upon by our southern neighbors that they can add up to 50% of the GDP. Since when is the American taxpayer required to bolster the GDP of a foreign nation by subsidizing illegal workers? Since the executive branch started to go around congress and make policy with international nongovernmental organizations.

The important thing to remember is that the treason plays out outside borders as well as the inside. when a group of business people and nongovnermental organizations from foreign countrys set policy that is implemented by our president, ignoring the fact that Congress is the only body that should set foreign relations and trade, you are seeing treason of the highest level and a complete usurpation of the balance of power between Congress and the executive office. You see, the president no longer needs Congress to set foreign policy. He has the summit of the Americas to do it for him. He doesn't need Congress to vote on it either, because other departments like the treasury department acceptance of the matricular consular card, implement it without congressional authority.

1 : the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY
2 : the crime of attempting to overthrow the government of one's country or of assisting its enemies during war
Word History The words treason and tradition both come from the same Latin source. The Latin word traditio meant "teaching" or "tradition". These senses developed from its basic meaning, which was "the act of handing something over". Tradition is maintained by passing information from one generation to another. One kind of treason is committed when someone who has been entrusted with secret information passes it on to someone else. The word tradition was borrowed directly from the Latin traditio. Treason, on the other hand, came to us through early French, where traditio had changed into the word traison. [Middle English tresoun "treason", from early French traison (same meaning), derived from Latin tradition-, traditio "the action of handing over, tradition, betrayal", from traditus, past participle of tradere "to hand over, betray"

I add: see TED KENNEDY.

You see, the president no longer needs Congress to set foreign policy.

Well, he's going to need congress to come up with a bill to realize his immigration proposal.

If it is true that the remittances flow out of country, I suppose people can do what they want with their money. But if it is also true that they need not pay into social security, income tax, or any other tax, then these things need to be addressed.

Practically speaking, a person cannot possibly live and work for a wage in the United States without at least spending something here. With or without a large influx of immigrants, we have some serious problems when it comes to voting ourselves largesse and keeping a lid on general malfeasance.