Skip to comments.
'Intel Inside' Comes To Flat Panel TVs
New Scientist ^
| 1-4-2004
| Celeste Biever
Posted on 01/09/2004 7:40:57 AM PST by blam
'Intel inside' comes to flat panel TVs
14:05 09 January 04
NewScientist.com news service
Computer chip giant Intel is to enter the consumer electronics market for the first time with a chip specifically designed to power cheaper, better flat-panel TV displays.
Intels CEO Paul Otellini told the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on Thursday that his companys new liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCOS) chips would yield displays priced below $2000 and provide crisper images than rival technologies. These include the digital light processors (DLP) pioneered by Texas Instruments - those displays sell for between $3000 and $6000.
Philips, Sony, Mitsubishi and Toshiba are already selling flat panel LCOS displays that are cheaper than DLP equivalents. But Kevin Cornelius, display technologies manager at Intel, says TVs with Intel chips will have crisper images. This is because the Intel chips are 100 per cent digital, whereas most LCOS technologies still control the liquid crystals using analogue voltages, which are more difficult to produce accurately.
Analysts say Intel's position as the worlds largest chip producer makes its entry into the market significant.
"There are currently thousands of TVs with this technology, but Intel will have an interest in producing millions," says Richard Doherty, a consumer electronics industry analyst at consultants Envisioneering in Seaford, New York. "Intel coming into this is justification that we are on the right track."
Blurred lines
Furthermore, Intels entry into consumer electronics reinforces the convergence of the PC and home entertainment systems. "The lines are blurring," Otellini said. The trend is being driven by the increasingly digital nature of entertainment media and the ability to connect devices wirelessly.
In another move highlighting the trend, Microsoft's Bill Gates unveiled software on Wednesday that will allow TVs to display content from PCs and allows users to use a remote control to navigate music files, digital photos and other stored media.
"The home is changing from a technology standpoint, and Intel has recognised that where there is change, there is opportunity," says Chris Chinnock, president of Insight Media, a digital consulting firm in Norwalk, Connecticut. "LCOS is a hot segment right now. There is more demand than supply."
Micro-projection
LCOS is a "micro-projection" technology. It is cheaper than earlier direct-view technologies, such as plasma and liquid crystal, because it requires only a tiny amount of optical-quality glass.
An LCOS image is created on a one-inch chip by individually controlling millions of tiny pixels. The image is then projected on to the much larger display surface with a device called a light engine. With direct-view technologies the image must be created at the actual size that it is viewed, requiring much more optical quality glass. Direct-view TVs cost between $6000 and $10,000. The first micro-projection technology was DLP. These use arrays of micro-mirrors that tilt to control how much light is reflected. Higher resolution can be achieved by adding more mirrors. But, because the mirrors cannot easily be manipulated below a minimum size, the chip must get bigger. This then requires a bigger lens, meaning a more expensive product.
Molecular twist
LCOS does not suffer this problem and in 2003 companies including Hitachi, Philips and Sony brought out the first LCOS chips. Instead of reflection, these chips use refraction to create varying grayscale and therefore avoid the need for moving parts.
An LCOS chip consists of a layer of silicon transistors that control the voltages in a second layer of transistors. The second layer of transistors sits next to a layer of liquid crystals, molecules that twist in response to a change in voltage.
This twisting controls the refraction of the light and generates the grayscale variation. Higher resolution is achieved by using a smaller area of liquid crystal per pixel, meaning the chip stays the same size.
Celeste Biever
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: flat; inside; intel; panel; tvs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Consumer electronics of this nature is a brutal business...I would keep an eye on my Intel stock price.
1
posted on
01/09/2004 7:40:58 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
If they can cut the price of a flat screen plasma TV down to $500, Intel stands to make a huge profit.
2
posted on
01/09/2004 7:42:06 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
56 |
South Dakota |
20.00
|
1
|
20.00
|
44
|
0.45
|
30.00
|
2
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
3
posted on
01/09/2004 7:42:17 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: blam
What are they gonna do with all those old, giant, projectio TVs?..you know, the ones that are the size of VW and take jup 2/3 of the den...are they gonna dump them in the ocean, like old railroad cars, to make a man-made reef?
4
posted on
01/09/2004 7:48:13 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
Hey! Stop talking about my TV that way!
5
posted on
01/09/2004 7:51:52 AM PST
by
Arkie2
To: goldstategop
Don't ever buy a plasma screen, the quoted life is some BS that would supposedly last 7 years but in reality their only getting 3 years out of these things.
There have been some nice advancments in LCD that have seen the sizes increase and the benefit is that the bulbs can actually be changed. Not so for plasma, once it's dead it's dead.
6
posted on
01/09/2004 7:52:39 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Bush and Co. are quickly convincing me that the Constitution Party is our only hope.)
To: Arkie2
I was gonna get one a few years ago, when I thought the jets might make the Super Bowl, but my old lady had a cow..no way, she said..now, I'm glad I waited....
7
posted on
01/09/2004 7:53:57 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
"like old railroad cars, to make a man-made reef?"
Small condos for the homeless?
To: truthandjustice1
Nah..they've thrown the cartons away already..
9
posted on
01/09/2004 7:55:19 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: goldstategop
If they can get down to under $2000 for some of the larger ones they stand to make a huge profit. Admittedly the prices have fallen but I'm not going to pay $1,000 for a 17 inch flat panel
10
posted on
01/09/2004 7:55:30 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: ken5050
Hollow them out and rent them as studio appartments.
11
posted on
01/09/2004 7:56:08 AM PST
by
discostu
(and the tenor sax is blowing its nose)
To: ken5050
Mine is actually a Sony flat screen and only 5 years old so I'll stick with it for several years to come. By that time I expect to get a killer deal on the latest plasma screen. ;^)
12
posted on
01/09/2004 7:56:23 AM PST
by
Arkie2
To: Bikers4Bush
I was looking at TVs the other day. It was depressing. The stuff above a couple of thousand looks amazing. In fact, it makes the lesser TVs that are reasonably priced look downright lousy.
My current television is dying, I just hope it lasts long enough for the prices on the next generation stuff to drop to a reasonable level.
To: Bikers4Bush
Moore's Law says that everything gets cheaper and better. By the time it wears out, the new model will be cheaper and better than when you originally bought it. Same with flat screen TVs.
14
posted on
01/09/2004 7:56:43 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Bikers4Bush
I got a DLP projector and couldn't be happier. Takes up *NO* space, weighs 3 lbs.
15
posted on
01/09/2004 7:58:26 AM PST
by
BrooklynGOP
(www.logicandsanity.com)
To: Arkie2
I've been looking seriously for a few months....I think Gateway is gonna try and buy market share, as well as try to save its ass, by dropping prices on theirs real soon..they've got a huge marketing campaign on now, and in a few months, before they startto introduce the new models for the Xmas season, they'll be a 20-30% price cut.......
16
posted on
01/09/2004 7:59:07 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: goldstategop
That may be so, but I'm not willing to pay $5,000 for something that will wear out in 3 years.
17
posted on
01/09/2004 8:00:51 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Bush and Co. are quickly convincing me that the Constitution Party is our only hope.)
To: blam
So, will Intel have two versions of their tv products? You know what I mean, one version that works beautifully and one stamped Celeron that only does 70% of the job?
18
posted on
01/09/2004 8:00:52 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: blam
I don't understand all the people last year lining up to buy 6 and 8 Thousand Dollar flat screens. I want one too but I can wait two years for the day when I can buy a same or better set for $400. Don't any of these people have a clue how consumer electronics development and pricing works? DVD players are $35 and LCD computer monitors are $200. Flat TVs will be no exception.
19
posted on
01/09/2004 8:01:21 AM PST
by
azcap
To: BrooklynGOP
Did you mount it to the ceiling? I'm considering doing something like that with a Fujitsu projector only down side being I'll need to buy a few spare bulbs for the future and they aren't cheap at $400+ each.
20
posted on
01/09/2004 8:02:32 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Bush and Co. are quickly convincing me that the Constitution Party is our only hope.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson