Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition to Amend the Michigan Constitution to end cannabis prohibition
http://www.apublicservice.com/index.html ^ | December, 2003 | Michigan petition drive

Posted on 01/09/2004 10:43:00 AM PST by poodle

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

A PETITION TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN BY AMENDING ARTICLE 1 OF THE MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION TO ADD A SECTION 25 AND SECTION 26 AND ARTICLE 4 TO ADD A SECTION 55 WHICH WOULD READ AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1, Section 25 The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed.

Article 1, Section 26 The right of the people to regulate intrastate commerce is recognized and shall not be infringed.

Article 4, Section 55

No person who has reached the age of 21 years shall be fined, arrested or otherwise be denied the enjoyment of his or her civil or political rights for the personal cultivation or possession of marijuana or marijuana products. A marijuana product is any product containing marijuana plant parts.

Industrial hemp is defined as marijuana plant parts or products containing less than 0.3% THC and shall not be regulated by any governmental body or agency of Michigan.

Medical marijuana may be provided patients under age 21 for treatment prescribed by their licensed, supervising physician.

Any Michigan resident who has reached the age of 21 years may apply to the liquor control commission for a certificate to cultivate marijuana in Michigan for sale to authorized retailers and manufacturers within Michigan. The cost of such certificate shall not exceed $1,000.00 and may not be denied except for age or residency.

Any Michigan resident who has reached the age of 21 years may apply to the liquor control commission for a certificate to manufacture marijuana products in Michigan, from marijuana grown in Michigan, for sale to authorized retailers within Michigan. The cost of such certificate shall not exceed $1,000.00 and may not be denied except for age or residency.

Any retailer legally authorized to sell alcoholic beverages is authorized to sell marijuana, grown in Michigan, or marijuana products, from marijuana grown in Michigan, to any person who has reached the age of 21 years, during the hours so authorized to sell alcoholic beverages.

No governmental body or agency of Michigan shall set prices on marijuana or marijuana products and total taxes shall not exceed thirty-five percent of retail prices. The liquor control commission shall require retailers of marijuana and marijuana products to have a copy of the growers’ and manufacturers’ certificates on hand and manufacturers of marijuana products to have a copy of the growers’ certificates on hand.

No governmental body or agency of Michigan shall utilize any state or local resources or personnel investigating, notifying or enforcing any other agency's or government's laws or regulations affecting marijuana possession or distribution.

What the Amendment to the Michigan Constitution will accomplish

It legalizes the personal possession and cultivation of marijuana in Michigan. State, county, city, township, and village agencies will no longer arrest people for having marijuana on their person, in their home or in their garden. Irresponsible behaviors regarding the consumption of marijuana, such as driving while impaired or even public smoking can still result in a ticket or arrest.

It allows commercial cultivation through certificates issued by the liquor control commission. Most marijuana today is grown indoors or in remote fields. This is not only done to avoid arrest but to avoid people stealing the crop for their own use. Commercial farmers will most likely use greenhouses and basements. The quality will be outstanding and satisfy consumer demand.

Retailers who have a liquor license will decide if they want to sell marijuana grown in Michigan during the hours they can sell booze.

Since this amendment only legalizes marijuana grown and sold in Michigan it also puts Michigan marijuana consumers out of the reach of the federal government. The Supreme Court ruled in May 2001, that the federal government can shut down California clinics that distribute marijuana to aids and cancer patients because the federal government can regulate interstate commerce. That marijuana could come from Ohio or Columbia.

Since Michigan liquor retailers will only be selling marijuana grown in Michigan, the federal government will be out of the picture. As long as the Supreme Court respects the right of Michigan to regulate it's own intrastate commerce, the federal government won't be able to arrest anyone.

This amendment also avoids the whole issue of medical marijuana. Since marijuana would be available at liquor retailers, doctors are kept out of the middle and won't have to write prescriptions. And dying cancer and aids patients won't have to wait 6-8 months for their marijuana crops to grow.

A legal system to sell marijuana through liquor retailers will make it tougher for kids to get. Kids report that it is easier to obtain marijuana than beer.

And marijuana smokers will no longer be going to the black market, and to dealers who sell heroin, cocaine, acid, just to name a few. The police can concentrate their efforts on drug dealers and with much less illegal demand for marijuana, a lot smaller black market.

And tax it. Use the money for treatment programs, and save a piece of the $1.5 billion Michigan spends each year on its prison system.

Support the FREE MARIJUANA amendment. You won't see marijuana covering the landscape or more pot than is already smoked at concerts. Kids will learn that marijuana is an adult vice, like tobacco and alcohol and is not a healthy habit. IT'S NOT WORTH SENDING AMERICANS TO JAIL!


TOPICS: Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: amendment; drugwar; marijuana; wod; wodlist
A petition to gather over 300,000 signatures to put a ballot iniative before the people of Michigan to legalize cannabis has begun. If you would like to help or find out more, the homepage is http://www.apublicservice.com/index.html
1 posted on 01/09/2004 10:43:02 AM PST by poodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
God Bless This Great Country!


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!



2 posted on 01/09/2004 10:43:55 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle
Good, it's about time the people revolted against stupid drug laws
3 posted on 01/09/2004 10:46:14 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
For the WOD list!
4 posted on 01/09/2004 10:46:57 AM PST by CSM (Councilmember Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
I will have to reply that this is one petition I WILL NOT SIGN! What a crock - make a change to the states Constitution for a frivolous use.
5 posted on 01/09/2004 10:48:00 AM PST by Core_Conservative (ODC-GIRL - the love of my life! - supporting Homeland Defense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: poodle
It is admittedly stupid to run around arresting people for smoking a plant. But ...

Article 1, Section 25 The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed.

What are we trying to say here? This catchall phrase seems to open the door to legalized child abuse, child porn, conspiracy, etc. as long as its done behind closed doors. Aint'a gonna work.

6 posted on 01/09/2004 10:50:09 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher ("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle
This is pretty much an uneccesary publicity stunt. (And I'm a full supporter of the complete end of the WOD, and all the 1s, 2nd, 4th, 5th ammenmdment trashing garbage that goes along with it) if State governners & legislatures would simply enforce the 10th ammendment, alot of federal BS would stop.
Also, this smells of the school of thought that says "the constitution grants us rights" - which is flat out wrong headed, rather then "the constitution is a restriction on what government can and can't do".
7 posted on 01/09/2004 10:55:06 AM PST by tomakaze ( Todays "useful idiot" is tomorrows "useless eater")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle
To The Smokey Backroom in 5...4...3...2...
8 posted on 01/09/2004 11:26:29 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle
I would certainly welcome seeing such a thing placed on the ballot and passed. Then in ten years or less, you would see the same thing for cocaine. Then heroin. Then LSD. Then angel dust. Then GHB.

And not necessarily in that order.

Bad idea, now and forever.

I am sure Michigan will defeat the measure, assuming it even gets on the ballot.

9 posted on 01/09/2004 11:27:05 AM PST by Houmatt (Kooldawg is a coward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; *Wod_list
WOD bump

Although good intentioned, this would have no effect, as DEA thugs will still come to Michigan to persecute those performing activities which are perfectly legal under state law. The New Deal-era Commerce Clause twistings, uh, SCOTUS interpretations will have to be rolled back and the original intent of the Tenth Amendment will need to be restored before such legislation can have any real meaning.

10 posted on 01/09/2004 12:26:29 PM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner
How could they use the commerce clause if no trade is allowed outside of the state? Just curious if you might know, not arguing with you. I would love to see the battle between a state and the feds over the 9th and 10th.
11 posted on 01/09/2004 1:37:49 PM PST by CSM (Councilmember Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Big Midget
That's why Madison and the other founders excluded the concept of the right to be secure in our homes, persons, and property from the Bill of Rights.

Like every other Constitutional right, that is not an absolute and never has been. Otherwise, people could conceivably roam the streets at will robbing, raping, and murdering their fellow citizens, but be olly olly oxen free if they simply make it home before the police catch them.

I sometimes wonder if enough of my fellow countrymen are ever again going to 'grock' the concept of "rights."

Actually that's "grok", at least if you're referring to its approximate Heinleinian meaning; "to understand fully down to one's soul".

Rights are NOT something the government grants us. Rights come from God.

I have no dispute with that. But like everything else, you have to read the fine print. There is no such thing as a right that is never subject to challenge or interpretation. For if there were, justice would be as simple as printing a rule book or leaving the enforcement of man's law up to God.

13 posted on 01/09/2004 5:39:29 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher ("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CSM
How could they use the commerce clause if no trade is allowed outside of the state?

It's what the DEA used to justify raiding medipot clinics in California, which were operating legally under state law. FYI - the first such raid occurred in October 2001 -- six weeks after 9/11 -- when one would think that the feds had better things to do.

14 posted on 01/10/2004 5:24:48 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CSM
FYI: the New Deal-era interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause is based on the potential for interstate commerce, not the actual commerce itself. Unfortunately, this perverted interpretation has been upheld by SCOTUS again and again -- it will take legislation to undo it -- and it's a safe bet that pigs will fly before Congress would pass any such legislation.
15 posted on 01/10/2004 5:29:23 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: poodle

what can we do to legalize it


18 posted on 07/07/2005 8:48:51 PM PDT by letpotfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle

would u like me to go around and collect siguanturs


19 posted on 07/07/2005 8:50:32 PM PDT by letpotfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle

A self-governance BTTT.


20 posted on 07/07/2005 8:50:59 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson