Posted on 01/09/2004 3:42:23 PM PST by William McKinley
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Dr. Howard Dean poses for me an unanticipated moral dilemma. Throughout the 1990s, I debated him on a little-known public affairs show taped in Montreal -- beautiful Montreal, I should add. It is a grand city with much of the elegance of France and the added asset of having almost no native-born French.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Instead, it sounds to me like he is standing nearby with a gascan, wondering if he should pour...
Rank | Location | Receipts | Donors/Avg | Freepers/Avg | Monthlies | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 | Minnesota | 470.00 |
14 |
33.57 |
250 |
1.88 |
100.00 |
7 |
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
And I believe he's reaching in his pocket for a book of matches.
Reading between the lines, one would suppose that there is much more worth revealing than Dean's characterization of the Hawkeye Cauci as unrepresentative "special interests".
One juicy item -- which has already been reported, but hasn't gained much exposure as yet -- is Dean referring to the death of Yassir Arafat as "the next tragedy".
If I am not mistaken, Mark Steyn also guested on this show and may have some Dean stories of his own.
Reporters report.
Tyrell seems to be wondering if being a gentlemen means that he should not say anything because Dean was a political pup.
But Tyrell should report, and let us decide if it should be dismissed as the rantings of a neophyte who has grown. Particularly since there is a lot of evidence that he is just as prone to sticking his foot in his mouth now and saying whatever he thinks will work, regardless of what it means.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.