1 posted on
01/10/2004 2:48:34 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Women were more divided, with 39 percent saying they would definitely vote for someone else. Unstated: 61% of women asked would vote for W.
2 posted on
01/10/2004 2:51:43 AM PST by
metesky
("But Dad, it's only a wooden horse." - Paris of Troy)
To: All
To: kattracks
Translation:
Democrats: Its a homosexual, baby-killing, thieving, treasonous, psychotic thing!
4 posted on
01/10/2004 2:55:41 AM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(I say the emperor has no clothes. Doesn't anyone else see this?)
To: kattracks
Get out your 2000 voting results "Bush Country" map. THe way the polls are shaping up, it could very well be a repeat of the same red/blue pattern. Although, Bush will probably get the majority of the popular vote in 2004.
6 posted on
01/10/2004 3:09:48 AM PST by
Ophiucus
To: kattracks
"
Women were more divided, with 39 percent saying they would definitely vote for someone else."
That figure got me thinking about my courting days, and how many of the "babes" needed more than just good looks, honesty, and being polite on a date.
And with GWB being all those things, these poor wenches [39%] probably need a "rogue" in the White House they can fantasize about.
Leaving computer desk, and heading for the fallout shelter .......
7 posted on
01/10/2004 3:13:28 AM PST by
G.Mason
(Oh Hillary ....... GWB is waiting!)
To: kattracks
Lol, they wish.
My apologies, this really is the perfect all-occassion response to comments made by the terrorist appeasers these days:
''When you men get home and face an anti-war protester, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend, because she knows she's dating a pussy.'' -- Tommy Franks (Cannoneer No. 4)
13 posted on
01/10/2004 6:49:27 AM PST by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(Afghans re. their *Taliban disease* ~ "the US cured it with an injection of B52!.." ~ Freeper merrin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson