1 posted on
01/10/2004 9:50:02 AM PST by
Hal1950
To: Hal1950
in the first three months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for removing Saddam Hussein from power I freepin' hope so! O'Neil might be an idiot, but at least he's confirmed that the Bush Administration was thinking ahead and trying to correct some of the wrongs of the previous eight years!
2 posted on
01/10/2004 9:53:05 AM PST by
Gerasimov
To: Hal1950
Makes no difference to me.
Saddam deserved an ouster long before 9/11.
To: All
Got a nose for the news?
Then come join us anytime!
No need to spend money on clothes!
Casual attire welcome!
Donate the money you save on your wardrobe to Free Republic!
4 posted on
01/10/2004 9:54:36 AM PST by
Support Free Republic
(If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
To: Hal1950
This is known as contingency planning. We would be remiss not to have such plans, but that is no indication of the likelihood that they would be put to use.
Paul O'Neill is a loose cannon, who was fired because he never knew when to keep his mouth shut. He may have been a good businessman, but he was way over his head as a cabinet secretary.
5 posted on
01/10/2004 9:54:55 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Hal1950
"There are memos," Suskind tells Stahl, "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam Iraq.'" This should silence all of the "there is no plan" whiners.
6 posted on
01/10/2004 9:55:15 AM PST by
McLynnan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson