Skip to comments.
O'Neill: Iraq Plans Began at Start of Bush's Term
Fox News ^
| 01.10.04
| N.N.
Posted on 01/10/2004 6:04:01 PM PST by Bouldin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Bouldin
Poor little O'Neill had his ego bruised when the administration let him go for being a gross incompetent. Now, on the eve of Iowa, he will let himself be a pawn for the Jackass party. What an idiotic clown. I wonder if he's any relation to Jim Jeffords?
To: NonValueAdded
Was this the wuss that had the debate with Sheets Byrd about which one knew more about real poverty? Sheesh what a pathetic sound bite that was for the evening news, I believe the President gave him the gong shortly after that foolish exchange.
22
posted on
01/10/2004 6:43:42 PM PST
by
Maumee
(r)
To: Maumee
Yes, that was O'Neill in the exchange with former Klansman Byrd (D-WV).
To: Bouldin
Bush acted appropriately in firing his @ss , time to move on and forget O'neill ever existed. There is more important issues to contend with.
24
posted on
01/10/2004 6:49:45 PM PST
by
EGPWS
To: YaYa123
Actually O'Neill is caught in a contradiction.
He says Bush was not an engaged President while at the same time saying Bush came into office making plans for war...
25
posted on
01/10/2004 6:54:03 PM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: DB
Remarkably true; excellent observation.
To: Az Joe
The original response to an attack by Japan in the 30's, if I remember correctly, not with my resources and am at work.
27
posted on
01/10/2004 7:04:44 PM PST
by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: Bouldin
Uh- huh, and OPLAN ORANGE for the defense of the Pacific that included the shelling of the Japanese home islands was written in 1935 right after FDR won the election. So what's this fired Bush administration official trying to say? That Bush did his job?
28
posted on
01/10/2004 7:15:46 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Bouldin
Wrong. The prior administration had already tagged Iraq as a WMD threat. Bush's team, besides having their own national security heavyweights (Powell, Rumsfeld, Rice) would have been briefed by the Clintonites and CIA on the way in. Further, there were many reasons for going into Iraq and I'm thinking there are now many reasons to turn left and clean up Syria.
29
posted on
01/10/2004 7:20:37 PM PST
by
Williams
To: DB
"He says Bush was not an engaged President while at the same time saying Bush came into office making plans for war..." I know, I know...but I bet not one book tour interviewer challenges his logic.
30
posted on
01/10/2004 7:40:57 PM PST
by
YaYa123
(@Or Lack Of It.com)
To: NonValueAdded
Think 60 Minutes will bring up the fact that once the President kicked O'Neill out the door the economy jumped through the roof?
31
posted on
01/10/2004 8:08:27 PM PST
by
God luvs America
(Howard Dean is a deranged lunatic!!)
To: Bouldin
Paul, go back to Africa with your buddy Bono and smoke some good weed.
It might straighten your head out!
32
posted on
01/10/2004 8:48:13 PM PST
by
HardStarboard
(Dump Wesley Clark.....he worries me as much as Hillary!)
To: Bouldin
33
posted on
01/10/2004 8:56:27 PM PST
by
Mentos
To: Bouldin
Someone post the picture of this idiot traipsing through Africa in his Pajamas...
34
posted on
01/10/2004 8:58:07 PM PST
by
Guillermo
(It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
To: Bouldin
Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill (search) contends the United States began laying the groundwork for an invasion of Iraq just days after President Bush took office in January 2001 more than two years before the start of the U.S.-led war that ousted Saddam Hussein.
I wouldn't be suprised if this were true. In the run-up to the war when all the usual suspects were crying that this was taking us away from the war on terror, a question occured to me. What if the opposite were true? What if 9-11 and the war on terror got in the way of taking out Butcher of Baghdad?
Just some food for thought..
35
posted on
01/10/2004 8:58:07 PM PST
by
Valin
(We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
To: Bouldin
Bush even knew how to spell Al Qaeda.
And you could?
36
posted on
01/10/2004 9:00:07 PM PST
by
Valin
(We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
To: SandRat
OPLAN ORANGE for the defense of the Pacific that included the shelling of the Japanese home islands was written in 1935 right after FDR won the election. Interesting! Makes me wonder why FDR didn't declare war on Japan when they sank our battleship( I think it was the Panay in the Yahtzee River in 1938)- that was an outright act of war and violated all treaties.
If we had gone to war prior to Pearl Harbor, many lives would have been saved during WWII. The last figures I heard for American soldiers during WWII was 400,000 killed and 1,000,000 wounded.
37
posted on
01/10/2004 9:06:55 PM PST
by
Susannah
(AMERICA is the best! - Could hundreds of millions of immigrants be wrong?)
IIRC, O'Neill was once CEO at Alcoa. Guess he's an expert on foil.
38
posted on
01/10/2004 9:26:51 PM PST
by
auboy
(I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
To: Susannah
39
posted on
01/10/2004 9:30:31 PM PST
by
Valin
(We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
To: Bouldin
Do you really think Iraq wasn't engaged in terrorism and WMD's before 9/11? The 100,000 Kurds that Saddam killed with WMD's happened when? 1996? Anyone remember?
40
posted on
01/10/2004 9:31:09 PM PST
by
TaxRelief
("Links" build the chain of knowledge)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson