Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suit Challenges Constitutionality of Utah Ban on Polygamy
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | January 12, 2004 | Alexandria Sage

Posted on 01/12/2004 2:11:03 PM PST by mrobison

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last
I'm so confused...
1 posted on 01/12/2004 2:11:03 PM PST by mrobison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mrobison
The inevitable result, as predicted, of the court decision on gay marriage, etc.
2 posted on 01/12/2004 2:14:39 PM PST by Redbob (now to find a cure for global whining...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Why a man would want more than one wife at a time dwelves into sanity issues, IMO.
3 posted on 01/12/2004 2:14:42 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
In denying the marriage license, the county violated the plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to practice their religion, attorney Brian Barnard says in the suit.

Actually he has a better shot with that ever elusive 14th amendment where so-called privacy trumps reason. This should be an easy win after Lawrence. Bet the media left forgets they own Rick Santorum an apology.

4 posted on 01/12/2004 2:15:03 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
SORRY!

Meant to say, "Inevitable result of Supreme Court decision on Texas sodomy statute."
5 posted on 01/12/2004 2:15:54 PM PST by Redbob (now to find a cure for global whining...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Read Rick Santorm's predictions of the consequences of the Lawrence case. It happened faster than anybody expected, but it is just as expected in content.
6 posted on 01/12/2004 2:16:59 PM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
The irony of these folks using a struck-down anti-sodomy law to advocate for their religious rights is just too out there.
7 posted on 01/12/2004 2:18:25 PM PST by mrobison (We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Hey, Mod Squad:

If this isn't legit Breaking News, I don't know what is. Why did you pull it?

8 posted on 01/12/2004 2:19:50 PM PST by mrobison (We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: mrobison
Here it comes - the fall-out from the Texas Sodomite decision
11 posted on 01/12/2004 2:25:41 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
A good day for Libertarians! What is the problem??

12 posted on 01/12/2004 2:26:41 PM PST by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison; Green Knight
This is the logical outgrowth of the Massachusetts decision and all that the lawyer is doing here is taking it to its logical extremes. And since we can't have the government meddling in religion or some kind of "optional polygamy" for Mormon schismatics and the like, the inevitable result is going to be the creation of a kind of secular polygamy.

Oui.
13 posted on 01/12/2004 2:27:01 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: mrobison

I have yet to see a good reason for polygamy among consenting adults to be outlawed.


15 posted on 01/12/2004 2:32:22 PM PST by Eris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Let's stop here and remember Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. Texas from last June:
"...State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity are ... sustainable only in light of Bowers validation of laws based on moral choices," ... "This effectively decrees the end of all morals legislation."
So it goes...
16 posted on 01/12/2004 2:34:47 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison; little jeremiah
Bump and ping.
17 posted on 01/12/2004 2:35:03 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
The problem mostly happens when the state is asked to call these second, third, etc. partnerships marriage. Mere unmarried cohabitation, however immoral is no longer illegal in many (most?) places.
18 posted on 01/12/2004 2:35:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: mrobison
Hope they included polyandry. It wouldn't be fair for just men to get the multiple contract option.
20 posted on 01/12/2004 2:37:11 PM PST by bicycle thug (I'm just a Pitbull on the pant leg of opportunity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson