That is the answer, of course. And if the husband insists and overcomes her will, that is an assault and should be seen and judged as such. If he carries the AIDS virus it is an aggravated assault, perhaps even attempted murder.
Using this analysis, if the woman seeks or freely consents to an aggravated assault, she is fully complicit in the offense and is not without guilt herself.
This answer won't please those who worship at the altar of sexual permissiveness and indulgence, but they've missed the point badly anyway.
Sodomy in general and anal sodomy in particular are assaults, violent and offensive attacks on the human body, and ought to be seen and judged as such. Sodomy has in the past 20 years maimed and killed more men, women, and children in this country than we have lost in all our wars and armed conflicts combined.
Wearing a condom when one engages in anal sodomy is no better than wearing boxing gloves when one pummels an opponent in a ring.
Wrong discussion, Kev. This is about men and women engaging in vaginal intercourse; rather, this amounts to a man exposing his wife to the AIDS virus.
Wrong discussion, Kev. This is about men and women engaging in vaginal intercourse; rather, this amounts to a man exposing his wife to the AIDS virus.