Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canadian Outrage
Thanks for the scoop OC! As Johnny would say.."I did not know that."

I am sooo ready for this trial to begin.
26 posted on 01/15/2004 5:00:45 PM PST by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Lanza
I'm SOOOO ready also Lanza. This "defense" of MG's regarding the age of the baby is so bogus. Ask any of us who have had babies. Both of mine were underestimated by a long shot. The ultra sounds didn't clear that fact up much either. That is why I, at a size 6, ended up having over 9pound babies by C-Section obviously. By that time, My pelvis was not big enough to squeeze these huge babies through. Besides, it's common knowledge that Laci's LAST ultra sound was in September, almost a full three months till she disappeared. She had had an appointment with her OBGYN on December 23rd where he did the usual pelvic and "estimated" approx 32 weeks. But by her symptoms as early as December 14th, according to her girlfriends, she was having trouble breathing and had swollen feet and hands and was very tired. I was that way JUST PRIOR to delivery. The last three weeks of my pregnancies were pure torture. I do hope the Prosescution gets a good Specialist for their side and that they do the ONLY test that can accurately determine a baby's gestation. It is, according to Nancy Grace, a calcium bone density or development test. Don't quote me on the name of the test but it does entail measuring the calcium density and likely quantity in the babies bones.
27 posted on 01/15/2004 7:57:25 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson