Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Askel5
Yes, it is unlikely the object was still around centuries after the sack of Jerusalem, when the Roman government began to favor the Catholic Church. Besides that, Rome was sacked by the Goths in 410 and by the Vandals in 455, so anything valuable may have been carted off on one of those occasions.
45 posted on 01/15/2004 6:48:45 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
=== Besides that, Rome was sacked by the Goths in 410 and by the Vandals in 455,

Evidently, the folks on the "antiquities" .edu chatboard tend toward blaming Vandals as well.
46 posted on 01/15/2004 6:49:50 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
Besides that, Rome was sacked by the Goths in 410 and by the Vandals in 455...

But it was nullified by an "offsides" call.

67 posted on 01/15/2004 7:30:56 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson