To: lormand
Defeating Spector is more important than getting Toomey elected. In other words, I would vote for Toomey even if I knew he cannot be elected. We cannot have Spector as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
To: rcofdayton
"Defeating Spector is more important than getting Toomey elected. In other words, I would vote for Toomey even if I knew he cannot be elected. We cannot have Spector as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee."
Dittos on that!!!
With 5 OPEN Senate seats in the south, and all races lining up quite well, and with Illinois looking good for Bush, we may well have a net 4-5 pickup. that is 55-56 GOP Senators.
Conservatives are better off with 55 Republican Senators *without* Spectre than with 56 Republican Senators with him.
we need a more conservative chairman to fight for the judicial nominees.
Still, I dont expect Toomey to lose. I expect Toomey to beat Spectre then to go on and win on Bush's coattails in November. Bush and Toomey both will win PA.
And it will be a very good thing for conservatives.
8 posted on
01/16/2004 11:57:23 AM PST by
WOSG
(I don't want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
To: rcofdayton
Umm, even Specter is better then Lehey.
To: rcofdayton
your # 7...agree whole heartedly....the senate will remain republican with or with out specter...we are seeing RINOS acroos the country facing primarys...good thing too!
30 posted on
03/28/2004 7:59:56 AM PST by
rrrod
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson