Posted on 01/18/2004 5:51:53 AM PST by sopwith
At many schools, 6-year-olds don't compare books anymore — they make "text-to-text connections." Misbehaving students face not detention but the "alternative-instruction room," or "reinforcement room," or "reflection room." Children who once read now practice "SSR," or "sustained-silent reading."
And in Maryland, high-schoolers write "extended constructed responses" — the essay, in a simpler time.
Jargon has been a mainstay of bureaucracy for centuries, satirized in the works of Jonathan Swift and George Orwell. Education is particularly fertile ground: At school-board meetings, stakeholders gather to align curriculum to content standards; in class, teachers vertically articulate and differentiate instruction and give authentic, outcome-based assessments.
Now — with the teacher-training industry uncommonly influential, children encouraged to think in more complex terms, and new tests and reforms each coming with its own vocabulary — the vast menu of what's called eduspeak or educationese has oozed into the classrooms. A second-grade teacher announces "modeling efficient subtraction strategies" as the task of the day, while "selected response" has taken the place of "multiple choice."
"These are terms that will drive anyone to complete hysteria," said Robert Hartwell Fiske, publisher of the Vocabulary Review and author of the forthcoming "Dictionary of Disagreeable English."
"If teachers want to talk in those terms among themselves, they're welcome to — perhaps sequestered — but introducing children to them is criminal, dehumanizing," he said. "You can't have kids going around spouting this stuff."
Teachers say they use the language, which varies by state or district or school, because they're told to. Administrators say they use it because it's on the tests — and besides, everyone will learn it eventually. The theory also goes that if you want students to write a paragraph in a new way, you have to call it something new, too.
"Teachers are being observed more closely than ever before, and if you're not using the right jargon, you look like you don't know what you're doing — regardless of the fact that the little kids have no clue," said Jerry Taylor, a technology teacher outside Rochester, N.Y., who compiles one of many school-jargon glossaries on the Internet.
Students and parents say it's hard to keep up. The words change fast, several times within a student's academic career. There are ESL (English as a second language) students or LEP (limited English proficient) students or ELL (English language learners), depending on whom — and when — you ask. The library is the media center and the librarian the media specialist and, in some schools, homeroom has become advisory or Achievement Time or even Time to Care.
Robert Maeder, 17, a senior at Springbrook High School in Silver Spring, Md., finds the terms demeaning — especially "learning cottage," instead of "classroom trailer," and "assessment" for test.
"It's like renaming a prison 'The Happy Fun Place,' " he said. "Tests should be called tests. 'Brief constructed response' — you just wonder why they don't say 'paragraph.' It doesn't really serve any purpose renaming them."
Jargon is used when regular words are not sufficient to connote subtle technical meanings, when people want to establish themselves as authorities — neither of which is applicable in a first-grade class, said Georgetown University linguistics professor Deborah Tannen. "I don't think it's going to hurt the kids especially," she said. "But it seems silly."
Anne Henderson, a Washington, D.C.-based education consultant and author of "The Family Is Critical to Student Achievement," said that keeping up with language so removed from everyday life — and which, she said, teachers often can't define themselves — is frustrating for parents.
"It reinforces the divide between schools and families," she said, particularly for the poor and less educated. "Parents are like, 'What in the world does this all mean?' "
Steve Gibson, a Montgomery County community superintendent (de-jargoned: he oversees a group of schools), defends some of the changes. From "multiple choice" to "selected response": "When I grew up, oftentimes it was 'multiple guess,' and we don't want kids guessing, but selecting their response." From "paragraph" to "brief constructed response": "We want them to be very brief and right to the point with something they are going to construct."
But isn't it implicit that an essay is constructed?
"You and I know that, but I'm not so sure that young little people know that," he said. "My hope is that we're creating language for kids that is more explicit and to the point than it is confusing."
Its like calling murder a choice.
Its like calling a depraved lifestyle gay.
Like? Like? This from an "education consultant and author..." Sheech! All is lost.
Can't this educated person say, "Parents often say, "What in the world does all this mean?" What's with "Parents are like...?" I'm like really bummed about this. It's like really stupid, you know?
Teachers say they use the language, which varies by state or district or school, because they're told to. Administrators say they use [the bureaucratic babblespeak] because everyone will learn it eventually.
Maybe it's time the administrators took Remedial Logic. Nobody would learn it, or they would learn it at a far slower rate, if the administrators didn't use it. This is NOT a fait accompli.
The theory also goes that if you want students to write a paragraph in a new way, you have to call it something new, too.
First of all, why do you want the students to write a paragraph in a new way? What was wrong with the old one? It seemed to work perfectly well for a couple thousand years. In fact, it wasn't until incompetent administrators started tinkering with the language that public education began to fall flat on its face.
Secondly, this psycho-linguistic drivel is the brainchild of Noam Chomsky and his minions. Jabbering about "subtraction methodologies" doesn't teach Johnny arithmetic. It simply obscures the fact that Johnny isn't learning arithmetic.
Words have the power to illuminate or disguise. When you hear terms like "vertically articulate and differentiate instruction," it's obvious which is being done by today's educrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.