President polishes State of Union speech(Immigration "Plan" Cut Out Of Speech?)

AP ^ | 01/19/04 | AP

[Pubbie]

WASHINGTON - President Bush put the finishing touches Monday on a State of the Union speech that calls for modest expansions of voter-friendly programs while telling Congress to curb spending in the face of record-breaking budget deficits.

Between rehearsals for the Tuesday evening address, he told reporters: "I'm almost finished, in case you're interested. "

A bespectacled Bush ran through the speech, editing pen in hand, in the Family Theater of the White House. He read from a TelePrompTer to a small group of aides, including staff secretary Brett Kavanaugh and communications chief Dan Bartlett.

Bush seemed relaxed as he passed reporters en route to a brief appearance before the wives of black clergy members. He said with a laugh that the number of drafts had not reached the "triple digits."

The president left the State Room appearance as his wife sat down for lunch with the spouses, joking that he hadn't been invited. In fact, he returned to more rehearsals of a speech that will set his election-year agenda.

Bush will open his address with remarks on national security, then move into domestic priorities, contrary to past practice, aides say. He will urge Americans to back him on the war on terrorism, arguing that the path he has chosen, including invading Iraq, is the right one.

Bush's message - that his top responsibility is to protect Americans - comes at a time when Americans are split on his leadership.

In a CBS-New York Times poll earlier this month, people were about equally divided over his handling of foreign policy. But less than half said the American death toll in Iraq, which has climbed past 500 amid continuing violence, was worth it.

The second half of Bush's speech focuses on domestic priorities, with a special emphasis on the economy. He will seek to convince Americans that his series of tax cuts has turned the economy around, and that he is now turning his attention to job creation, who aides said.

Education sources have said he'll call for new job-training grants channeled through community colleges to help prepare American workers for a changing economy.

Constrained by red ink, Bush's job-training proposal will cost more than $120 million, said White House officials who declined to be more specific.

Democrats said they were determined to make sure the president does not get too much credit; he has cut vocational education and an array of job-training programs in recent years, they said.

Seeking to highlight the "compassion" in his "compassionate conservative" slogan, Bush will also propose steps to rein in the rising costs of health care. The Census Bureau reported that 43.6 million people lacked health insurance at some point in 2002, up from 39.8 million in 2000.

But administration officials said they did not foresee a sweeping new proposal to bring more Americans onto the rolls of the insured.

Last week, when the Institute of Medicine recommended for the first time that the government provide universal health insurance by 2010, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson called that "not realistic."

Last year, the administration last year proposed spending up to $89 billion in health care tax credits to help those who do not have employer-based coverage. The Republican-led Congress took no action.

This month, Bush has called for sweeping changes in immigration law and for establishing a research base on the moon.

His State of the Union address contains no such large-scale proposals, partly because the government faces record budget deficits. Next year, the shortfall is expected to be about $500 billion.

Bush has pledged to cut the deficit in half over the next five years, and is likely to reiterate the promise, aides said.

But Bush should go farther, and make federal spending restraint a centerpiece of his address, said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and a conservative who talks to White House officials often.

"There is a sense of, 'When are we going to rein in spending?'" Norquist said. "He needs to spend more time on the importance of spending restraint than on going to Mars."

More broadly, Norquist said, Bush must "make the case that he's had successes in the war on terrorism and on getting economic growth, (but) he needs to make the case that his job isn't finished. If he highlights just the successes, people will say, 'Thanks very much, but why would we rehire you?'"

[Pubbie]

"This month, Bush has called for sweeping changes in immigration law and for establishing a research base on the moon.

His State of the Union address contains no such large-scale proposals,"

I hope he drops the issue of Immigration out of the speech - if Bush isn't going to solve the problem, at least don't make the situation any worse than it already is.

[Pubbie]

*Ping*!

[adam_az]

Last week, when the Institute of Medicine recommended for the first time that the government provide universal health insurance by 2010, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson called that "not realistic."


Did TAXPAYERS pay for the "study" that made this recommendation??????


from the Institute of Medicine website http://www.iom.edu/faq.asp?id=2959

The National Academy of Sciences was created by the federal government to be an adviser on scientific and technological matters. However, the Academy and its associated organizations (e.g., the Institute of Medicine) are private, non-governmental, organizations and do not receive direct federal appropriations for their work. Studies undertaken for the government by the Academy complex usually are funded out of appropriations made available to federal agencies. Most of the studies carried out by the Academy complex are at the request of government agencies.

[WOSG]

"This month, Bush has called for sweeping changes in immigration law and for establishing a research base on the moon. His State of the Union address contains no such large-scale proposals,"

Excellent. A very good sign that the White House realized this would fall like a THUD if talked about. Which means in turn that they wont waste political capital making our immigration problems worse.

"I have a plan to send a man to Mars ... " wild applause
"I can announce We've caught Bin Laden ... " wild applause
"Make the tax cuts permanent ... " wild applause
"Hope growth and opportunity ... " wild applause
"and temp jobs for immigrants including illegals ... "

... sounds of crickets ....tumbleweed rolling down aisles ... wind rustling ...

[Zipporah]

With all the uproar about his proposal (that they would never admit to) he'd be a fool to include his proposal.

[adam_az]

IOM has CLOSED MEETINGS even though it is funded with taxpayer dollars and makes policy recommendations.

Forget the Energy Taskforce - THESE guys should open their records!!!

[Zipporah]

Ping

[Pubbie]

It's a very good sign if he doesn't bring up the plan in the speech.

Good to see Conservatives can still make a difference.

[onedoug]

...while telling Congress to curb spending in the face of record-breaking budget deficits....

That should get a chuckle, or two.

[BenR2]

Whether or not he cuts his Alfred E. Newman immigration plan out of the speech, it will still remain foremost in MY mind -- and the minds, I would submit, of tens of millions of my countrymen.

In fact, barring an abject retraction of that wrong-headed plan, I plan to devote my (paltry few) political dollars to ensuring that GWB remains a one-termer.

GWB's legacy? An incredible spendthrift who little regarded the Constitution (viz., CFR and a stunning refusal to defend the borders).

[Pubbie]

I understand your frustration, but do you really think a President John Kerry is going to close the borders?

[BenR2]

I understand your frustration, but do you really think a President John Kerry is going to close the borders?


//////////
That argument has lost its luster. A pox on both their political houses.

[Pubbie]

I still think it's a valid argument - You know perfectly well that any of the 8 dwarves will be 100xs worse than Bush ever was on immigration.

[Keith]

read my tagline...

[WOSG]

In fact, barring an abject retraction of that wrong-headed plan, I plan to devote my (paltry few) political dollars to ensuring that GWB remains a one-termer.

Careful ... Do you really want to KERRY this country that badly? Un-Kerry-believable.

[BenR2]

Careful ... Do you really want to KERRY this country that badly? Un-Kerry-believable.


/////////////
Look: The Congressional Republicans actually fought Clinton to a virtual standstill.

They have been derelict drunks on GWB's watch.

A little opposition may be what they need to remember what they are allegedly sworn to do . . . You know something or other about "upholding" some document, as I recall.

[WOSG]

"A pox on both their political houses."

Bush= tax cut, ban on PBA, DOMA supporter, USA over UN, enviro-moderate, good conservative judges, guest worker program, victory in war on terror,
Kerry= tax hike, abortion-on-demand, gay marriage supporter, UN over USA, enviro-whacko, ACLU judges, total open borders/amnesty, "French" view on war on terror,

Bush is chicken pox.

Kerry is bubonic plague.

No difference?!? You are seriously kerry'd in the head!

[BenR2]

No difference?!? You are seriously kerry'd in the head!

////////////
See my post #16.

The status quo is unacceptable.

[BenR2]

"French" view on war on terror,


////////////
Not true. His views on the war on terror are sound.

[WOSG]

The Congressional Republicans also passed a partial-birth abortion ban. Bush signed it.

Kerry voted against it and would have vetoed it like Clinton did.


Kerry has fought TOOTH AND NAIL against Conservative and moderate Judges.

Kerry voted FOR the big spending programs, and has the country's biggest enemy of taxpayers and friend of Big Govt - the Whale Himself Sen Kennedy.

As I said, Un-Kerry-beleivable that you'd think Kerry is eve n close to a 'safe' alternative.

GWB one termer? Then look forward to dark days like we had under Clinton.