[risk]

I haven't read this yet, but the truth doesn't care about politics. If he likes Nader, that's one thing. What happened with the anthrax is another. Let's take his research on its own merits. Have you found any actual inconsistencies, logical fallacies, or propaganda content in his writing?

[flamefront]

truth doesn't care about politics

I agree, after all I am the one saying this is plausible. But since you asked, while I find it interesting, the 'greendale' speculation above appears a bit of a stretch.

[HangThemHigh]

One apparent inconsistency between this and an an earlier post from the Washington Times http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1004849/posts concerns the quality of the mailed anthrax (specifically the mailings to the Senators).You definitely should read the link if you are interested in this.

The earlier post quotes an Iraq expert and former Clinton adviser, Laurie Mylroie, who says that the quality of the mailed spores was extraordinary and that they refused to stay on a microscope slide when scientists tried to examine them, due to their electrical charge and fineness. Interestingly, Miss Mylroie seems to think the anthrax came from Iraq.

OTOH the report above paints the anthrax material as somewhat crude.

I have no idea which of these accounts is more accurate. Either or both writers may have their own agenda.