Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake
"Can't you see the big question mark indicating that they do not know how long the incubation period lasted?"

Listen to me you snotty old man - I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT INCUBATION PERIODS! I never was - it was YOU that brought that up!

I was talking about WHEN he got sick - in other words his ONSET date!

As usual, you are twisting my words. My words were PERFECTLY CLEAR.

You are NOT looking at ALL the FACTS. You really need to look at ALL the FACTS. Then things might make MORE sense to YOU. Until you FINALLY decide to DO that, you will NEVER understand this CASE, and your website will CONTINUE to be TOTAL CRAP!
149 posted on 01/25/2004 8:14:59 AM PST by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: TrebleRebel
I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT INCUBATION PERIODS!

Hmmm. You not only cannot read, you evidently don't even understand what you are talking about.

You stated: "ALL the EVIDENCE clearly points to the fact that Blanco was exposed to anthrax BEFORE the Septemebr 25 letter was opened." The date he was exposed would be his exposure date. Understand. And the onset date would be the date he first showed symptoms. That would be - according the the CDC's current data - September 28, not the obsolete September 24 date you stated that you use.

You really seem like you are getting upset. Take a pill. Lie down. Maybe it will help you think more clearly. You really seem to be getting everything confused - particularly when you insist on using obsolete information.

Ed

www.anthraxinvestigation.com

152 posted on 01/25/2004 8:28:43 AM PST by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson