"Interesting interpretation, but I notice that you are now talking about an "additive" instead of a "coating"."
Any additive used to weaponize anthrax IS a coating. You are simply parsing words to try to defend your PURELY POLITICAL theory - that a drunk and his cohorts were responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks.
You need to look at ALL the FACTS. Once you look at ALL the FACTS you will see that your PURELY POLITICAL theory is total crap.
Any additive used to weaponize anthrax IS a coating.Hmmm. Interesting. Nonsense, but interesting.
It looks to me like we're just going in circles here. You interpret things and say they are facts. I present facts and you say they mean nothing.
There's no point in doing that all day for another day.
Ed
www.anthraxinvestigation.com