To: Theodore R.
Froma man who lies about Judaism, slanders Jewish law, and recycles classical antisemitism.
2 posted on
01/20/2004 9:26:37 AM PST by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: rmlew
At stake is the good name of the neoconservative philosophy. It would be a disaster to its principles for the general public to get the false impression that those principles are nothing but a front for agents of a foreign power who want to trick us into wars against our own interests. See? He's just looking out for neoconservatism. LOL.
3 posted on
01/20/2004 9:30:03 AM PST by
Huck
(Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
To: rmlew
Sobran also gives public addresses to The Institute for Historical Studies, one of the most blatant Holocaust revisionist outfits around.
7 posted on
01/20/2004 9:34:11 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: rmlew
Yep...thanks for reminding people of his clear agenda of hate.
To: rmlew
>>>"David Brooks of the New York Times says of the people labeled neocons that con is short for conservative and neo is short for Jewish."
This is an interesting new thought, but I think Brooks has the causality all wrong.
There are many neocons who are Christian and fully support Israel. In fact, in terms of quantity, the Christians are probably a large majority of the neocons.
But where he is close is that many Jews have a libertarian view of immigration - the more the merrier. They also prefer a weak defense - except in the case of Israel.
I guess I am what you call a paleo-conservative. Yet, I strongly support the defense of Israel. I just don't support the heavy non-defense subsidizing of a socialist nation.
All Jews are not neocons. All neocons are not Jewish. Not even a majority of neocons are Jewish. Just a tiny minority of Jews are neocons. So Brooks is off base with this divisive remark.
Although I've talked to quite a few Jews who support the Palestinians (quite chic in the younger ages), I think we can say that most Jews support the defense of Israel (they were given the territory by the British, and they defeated the Palestinians so many times I've lost count). But this doesn't make them neocons.
But we could say that some of the leaders and thinkers of the neocons are Jewish. But that should not, and is not, a brush that paints the whole group. I think of Rockefeller, a RINO, as the ideal neo-con. If he wants to link them to Jewishness then he should just call them kibitzers.
I dislike the neocons because of their position on immigration but I never thought of them as Jews. Nor did I think the term as an ethnic slur. In this age of hyper political correctness I guess everyone wants to be a victim. If Brooks wants to be a victim then each year he should parade himself around New York and beat himself with a stick like the Shite Moslems do.
Hoppy
To: rmlew
Here's how I see it.
Bob Novak > Pat Buchanan > Joe Sobran > David Duke
41 posted on
01/20/2004 12:24:44 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson