[TruthShallSetYouFree]

ANWAR is not a small town in Alaska, but is an acronym for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. I agree with your concept, however. The dems are nothing if not two-faced. Their "logic" goes something like this:

1. Agree that we are too dependent upon foreign oil, particularly from Saudi Arabia.
2. Vote down a proposal to drill in Alaska, where huge oil deposits have been confirmed.
3. Base your refusal on some obscure environmental reasons. This serves the dual purpose of pandering to your environmental-whacko constituency, while allowing you to thwart a republican energy proposal.
4. Complain that we are still dependent upon foreign oil, particularly from Saudi Arabia?
5. Question the President's truthfulness. Why is he willing to go into Iraq, which harbors and supports terrorists, but not Saudi Arabia. The President, therefore, is inconsistent.

Of course, if we can't drill in ANWAR and don't get to import Saudi Oil, our economy will be devastated, people will freeze their butts off, and general calamity will reign. Then the dems would ask how the President could have allowed such a situation to evolve.

[EQAndyBuzz]

Thank you on correcting me on Anwar. Always thought it had something to do with the location of Anwar Saddats summer home. /relax, kidding.

Well, we don't get the environmentalist vote anyway, so after this election, when there are 60 Rep senators, we open ANWAR to drilling and tell the tree huggers to shut up and sing.