Skip to comments.
Bush's space plan eyes new generation (developing rockets)
Boston GLobe ^
| January 21, 2004
| Bryan Bender
Posted on 01/21/2004 12:35:56 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:23 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Prior to the rollout of the presidents vision, NASA had hoped to accelerate the development of its planned Orbital Space Plane, which was supposed to be a replacement for the space shuttle. The goal of that program was to have a vehicle by 2008 that would be capable of transporting crews to and from the International Space Station. The idea was to eliminate the need for the shuttle or Russian-built Soyuz rockets to service the space station. Idiot reporter. OSP, like CEV, is a payload not a launcher. Now it could be that part of the program was a new launcher or man-rating an existing launcher, but that has been very scrupulously left unsaid.
Rather disquieting since you are talking about a very significant sum either way, and the final cost and capability will have a huge impact on the space program, probably more than the CEV decision itself.
To: steve8714
>People need to realize
we are losing high tech jobs, and losing the initiative to improve our tech industries.
Look at how many
high-tech companies are now
mostly overseas.
A major space push
will just empower these firms,
and solidify
their business structure.
Whatever boost we get, they --
Asia -- will get more...
To: cwboelter
And that new form of energy sources can be spun-off to power our automobiles to get us off the foreign oil and generating electricity other than nuclear.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Space exploration should be about 1/4 of the Defense Budget .... what better way for long term motivation of a nation than to have a frontier
It also allows people that do not deal with civilization well a way out to explore.
24
posted on
01/21/2004 1:29:15 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Exactly. The fact that these liberals are so blinded by their hatred to realize the potential energy bonanza here, is ignorant. Heck...just getting to Mars and beyond is going to require some innovative thinkers who "may" develop some new technologes. But, no...they see oil in everything Bush does.
25
posted on
01/21/2004 1:36:49 PM PST
by
cwb
(Dean = Dr. Jeckyll exposing his Hyde)
To: farmfriend
"It's been almost 30 years since we built a new launch system," said MIT's Crawley. "There is an enormous difference between the skills the nation had during Apollo and now. You have working at NASA now . . . a generation that has never built a rocket." Well, the Russian program, short on cash and long on brilliance, appears to be forging doggedly ahead.
26
posted on
01/21/2004 1:55:05 PM PST
by
TomSmedley
((technical writer looking for work!))
To: Dead Dog
The Luddites need to ask themselves how long this Nation will retain it's sovereignty once we no longer field a credible ICBM fleet More time than we have if we don't protect our sovereign borders.
27
posted on
01/21/2004 1:56:14 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
To: itsahoot
Bush has put that ball in Congresses court.
28
posted on
01/21/2004 2:18:26 PM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Give Moon,Mars Missions. to Military
To: steve8714
Let's see... WE spent (spend) BILLIONS and BILLIONS and TRILLIONS (voice of Carl Sagan....)and we get to see dead rocks and pretty stars, and a very few people get super thrill rides. SOME of them die . More people die every day in car wrecks than died in space.
This excellent choice in how our money was spent results in a nation that can't produce enough energy, jobs, or technolgy for everyday life.
While we fooled around with gov't controlled boondogles the Japaneses took over the ELECTRONICS industry, and made huge inroads into TRANSPORTATION, i.e. cars,trucks and construction machinery.
You want to talk WELFARE ? what is the space program except corporate welfare ? The gov't had no business supporting either type of welfare.The defense aspect would be a valid reason for missile/anti-missile research.
To: hoosierham
I calculated (roughly) that ONE trillion would be enough to put solar cell roofs on all the homes in the U.S. and produce enough electricity to power those homes and a big chunk of businesses.Figured $25,000 per installation times 40 million homes. Of course some are not suitable for this but then I didn't estimate how many equivalent roofs are above business.
Surely economy of scale could reduce manufacturing costs and it would employ lots of construction workers besides reducing burning of hydrocarbon fuels.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Interesting.
32
posted on
01/21/2004 7:23:03 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: Centurion2000
33
posted on
01/21/2004 7:52:31 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: hoosierham; BenLurkin; All
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson