To: ForGod'sSake
I think they do have an agenda and that is to lay out a new "theory" so they can get funded for more research in 2004 but that is just my opinion
68 posted on
01/22/2004 3:54:43 PM PST by
ruoflaw
To: ruoflaw
I think they do have an agenda and that is to lay out a new "theory" so they can get funded for more research in 2004 but that is just my opinion Well, it sounds as good as anything else. Any idea where most of this funding comes from? Is there a Junk Science Venture Capital group we haven't heard of? Ah, that would have to be the universities; gatekeepers for every kooky idea/theory/notion that rears its head? I dunno, but something smells.
FGS
69 posted on
01/22/2004 6:50:47 PM PST by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ruoflaw
I think they do have an agenda and that is to lay out a new "theory" so they can get funded for more research in 2004 but that is just my opinion.I'll agree with you. Academia: publish or perish, and lobby for those research grant applications!
70 posted on
01/22/2004 6:59:52 PM PST by
xJones
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson