Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired judge chosen to preside over Scott Peterson murder trial
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Wednesday, January 21, 2004 | Kim Curtis

Posted on 01/22/2004 5:39:59 AM PST by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-475 next last
To: drjulie
I don't know about THIS particular relationship Julie. It seems that these two people were on completely different wave lengths. From the testimony of Laci's family, I get the impression that she really didn't KNOW the guy she was married to. Laci, by all account, was happy. Also, both her Mom and her girlfriends said she was strong willed and that she wasn't the type to allow herself to be abused. I really believe Snotty was able to function with his double life because of his employment (travelling salesman). You can hide a lot of activities while "travelling"!! Appears it was the "perfect" job for him. Also it appears to me that Scott was maladaptive in ALL his relationships!! He's sick imo.
441 posted on 02/01/2004 1:28:14 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
"Also, both her Mom and her girlfriends said she was strong willed and that she wasn't the type to allow herself to be abused."

You could be right in your assessment of the situation. I tend to think that she did have some idea of what was going on - she might not have known about Amber but I bet she knew about past affairs, reckless spending and neglect (e.g., not attending her shower). All of this is abuse and, for some reason, she tolerated it. I honestly don't mean to disparage her Lynn - my heart breaks everytime I see her picture. I've just worked with so many women who are in these situations who believe that as long as their husbands aren't hitting them they aren't being abused. Did this guy have a double life? You bet. Did everyone around him know the extent of this double life? No - but I bet alot of people (Laci included) saw the tip of the iceberg from time to time. JMO :-)
442 posted on 02/01/2004 2:05:25 PM PST by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
"Also it appears to me that Scott was maladaptive in ALL his relationships!! He's sick imo."

I think the interesting question is...if he was married to a different kind of person would he have murdered? Would there have been a different outcome? I'm not arguing that he doesn't have issues! (I wouldn't get very far with that kind of argument! LOL)
443 posted on 02/01/2004 2:18:21 PM PST by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
I guess we'll never really know Julie. Perhaps Laci did see things through rose colored glasses. I just don't know. I do recall her girlfriends saying they didn't believe that He had told her about Amber because Laci was NOT the type to take that. I still believe this guy used his employment and travel as a cover. He likely had a separte cell phone # for Laci. The only person on the Rocha side of the family who seemed to have any clue about who Scott was is her Dad. I do believe he is a Sociopath and I don't believe he has "normal" feelings. His feelings are all about how HE feels regardless of who he is with.
444 posted on 02/01/2004 3:04:52 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
"His feelings are all about how HE feels regardless of who he is with."

I think we share the same opinion on that point! I have Fox News on as I work. They just had a little panel on discussing the Peterson case. The defense attorney (the one who was supposed to argue Scott's case) said when you put it all together it looks bad for him. Good to hear!
:-)
445 posted on 02/01/2004 4:05:22 PM PST by drjulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
the interesting question is...if he was married to a different kind of person would he have murdered?

IMO, eventually Scott would feel trapped being married to any woman, freedom seemingly his goal after a few years of marriage.

And his having to present a perfect image to the world have precluded a divorce in any marriage, JMO.

Something influencing my personal opinion are the two missing women in the general vicinity of Scott when they disappeared.

446 posted on 02/01/2004 5:05:56 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
That's good to hear!! And I believe it - put it all together and there is just TOO much to be coincidence.
447 posted on 02/01/2004 5:30:13 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: grizzfan
Those incidents of girls missing when he was in college is a "mystery" isn't it? Remember how he SUDDENLY left Arizona. He had been called in for an interview but never went in. Perhaps, with Laci, he thought he was proficient enough to pull it off. I doubt he banked on the fact the whole City LOVED Laci.
448 posted on 02/01/2004 5:32:21 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Overconfident? You are too kind!!!

It's called COLD-BLOODED!!
449 posted on 02/01/2004 6:19:10 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
Some women will back off, some will be stubborn and keep asking, some will enlist family, yes, I see what you're saying. I know one of those women who backed off--until it was too late. However, she doesn't seem to be obsessed with the finality of it, thank heaven.

And there's another thing some women might do... they might go ahead and let it happen, then half-heartedly pass it off to the husband as a failure of birth control. Maybe she did that. Maybe she figured, "I'll just wait it out, when that little darling who looks like both of us is out, smiling at him, he will accept it." And you know, drjulie, I think most men WOULD accept it. They might be resentful towards the wife, but they would also get to like the kid--usually. (I've even known criminals who were proud of their adorable kids.)

You know, though, if we are correct in assuming that Scott really, really didn't want to be a father, then I don't see why he didn't have a vasectomy. But then, we have already been asking ourselves why he didn't just get a divorce... and there seems to be no reasonable answer to that question.

I am very intrigued by your info about interaction of personalities leading to maladaptive behavior in one person, which behavior he doesn't show when he's interacting with OTHER personalities. Hey--that may explain my son and me, lol! Maybe it's my imagination, but he seems to be such a solid citizen... except when he's dealing with me! LOL.
450 posted on 02/01/2004 6:29:14 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
I love to observe STRANGE people! That is, foreigners will do; even better are crazy people. Needless to say, you can't look at crazy people with TOO much interest, or they will do something you might not like!
451 posted on 02/01/2004 6:33:29 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
Another thing you said... I see you were bending over backwards to emphasize that you were not blaming the victim. I have felt that way, too, when I contemplated whether maybe Laci was nagging Scott, or whether they were engaged in power struggles. I mean, nobody is a saint. She may have picked up a few of the bad traits a wife can pick up. It may have made him feel angry and dominated.

But these little flaws, if she had them, would be very, very small in the overall scheme of things. A decent man, when he got to seeing red over them, would step back, take a deep breath, and remind himself that "this too shall pass." But a man who's NOT decent... no telling!

452 posted on 02/01/2004 6:38:09 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
when you put it all together it looks bad for him

Exactly what Geragos used to say about Scott on TV.

453 posted on 02/01/2004 6:41:15 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
YIKES! I KNOW he's COLD-BLOODED but I also think because he has been able to get away with everything all his life, he was OVER CONFIDENT and became careless. He's not stupid, he's over confident in his abilities.
454 posted on 02/01/2004 7:43:24 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I suppose we could all analyze this till the cows come home but the main thing is this guy gets convicted. I am anxious to see what the Prosecution has NOT shown. I'm sure you agree Dev but MOST Prosecutors offices would NEVER go for a Death Penalty unless they thought they had a very good chance of getting a conviction. When Distaso let fly last time in Court and actually pointed at Peterson and said "then this man killed Laci Peterson"!! Distaso not only rattled Snotty somewhat but he rattled Geragos. Geragos was up on his feet and gave away the defense's strategy. I'll bet Jackie P. was not pleased either!! If ONLY something could still be found in the Bay that ABSOLUTELY ties Snott to Laci. (Perhaps there is - maybe a fingerprint on duct tape)!
455 posted on 02/01/2004 7:55:08 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
No doubt he was just beginning to hit his stride as a salesman: the first step to that is believing one's own b.s.!
456 posted on 02/01/2004 7:55:44 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
You know, though, if we are correct in assuming that Scott really, really didn't want to be a father, then I don't see why he didn't have a vasectomy.

Wonder if Scott was afraid a vasectomy would diminish his sex drive and somehow tarnish his perfect image?

457 posted on 02/01/2004 7:57:59 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Who else could have done this, but Scott?

That's not a valid argument for a courtroom, but it sure is a valid argument for just plain common sense. Who else had the motive, means, and opportunity, all coming together at once?

And what other killer would have taken such great pains to remove the body from SCOTT'S house? Why would they bother, when they could remove THEMSELVES from the scene and the crime far more easily?
458 posted on 02/01/2004 8:01:11 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: grizzfan
One of those reasons is probably why he didn't get one--though both those reasons are, as we know, spurious. A vasectomy has nothing to do with sex drive, that I've ever heard, but you're right, in Scott's male mind, maybe it did.

The perfect image thing is food for thought, too. A narcissistic type would be obsessed with keeping his body "perfect". Guess that would exclude even minor snipping--or whatever they do for vasectomies nowadays.
459 posted on 02/01/2004 8:04:47 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Did you notice if you rearrange the letters in "TUCOWS", you're left with "TU - SCOW"? But I digress.

Here's a "letter to the editor" from the owner of the site:

Letters: He's innocent

I am very pleased that Judge Girolami changed the venue for the Scott Peterson trial to San Mateo.

I am still concerned, however, that the national media bias against Scott will soon have the same effect here as it did in Modesto.

Sad to say, we have no national media that has championed Scott Peterson's cause. For that reason, a group of concerned citizens, devoted to the principle of presumption of innocence and convinced Peterson is not guilty, have put together a Web site called Scott is Innocent.

We discuss serious flaws in this investigation and in the evidence presented in the preliminary hearing. We have no "leaked" documents, as claimed by other media, just common-sense analysis of what is in the public record.

Take a look at what the media is not telling you about this case. Visit scottisinnocent.com.

Marlene Newell

http://www.sanmateocountytimes.com/Stories/0,1413,87%257E2458%257E1912404,00.html
460 posted on 02/02/2004 6:21:14 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-475 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson