To: iceskater
LoL. I found it while doing a little opposition research on another forum. They are so politically tone-deaf that they thought it was cool.
Geez...
15 posted on
01/22/2004 7:06:05 AM PST by
EllaMinnow
(I plan to be spontaneous tomorrow.)
To: redlipstick
They thought it was cool? Good grief.
17 posted on
01/22/2004 7:08:33 AM PST by
iceskater
(....and when h*ll freezes over, I'll skate there, too.)
To: redlipstick
Should Clark win the nomination, I'm counting on Gen. Shelton to elaborate on his "integrity and character issues" statement. For the good of the country....
19 posted on
01/22/2004 7:09:26 AM PST by
Quilla
To: redlipstick
Does anyone have links to the various conspiracy theories he has espoused?
1. That the White House called him on 9/11 to request he go public with the statement that Iraq was behind the attack. He had to retract that and said it was a Canadian think tank in Middle Eastern studies. He had to retract that as well.
2. That the White House got him fired from CNN. (As though CNN would do ANYTHING the White House asked of them). Hah
3. That the White House has plans to invade dozens of countries. As though every administration doesn't PLAN for that in the event of an emergency with that country. AND, as Charles Krauthammer mentioned on FNC one night, hopefully those plans include France.
4. There were a few others but they were so whacky that I can't remember them as I try to rid my mind of such trivia. LOL
20 posted on
01/22/2004 7:10:20 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: redlipstick
OMG, Glenn Beck is now talking about it and saying Drudge has something about it up on his site. I think you started something!!! LOL
21 posted on
01/22/2004 7:12:32 AM PST by
iceskater
(....and when h*ll freezes over, I'll skate there, too.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson