Skip to comments.
Infiltration of files seen as extensive
Boston Globe ^
| 1/22/2004
| Charlie Savage
Posted on 01/22/2004 5:27:06 PM PST by NortNork
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON -- Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary Commitee infiltrated opposition computer files for a year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The Globe.
From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic communications without a password. Trolling through hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points and accounts of private meetings discussing which judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what tactics.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: estradamemo; filibuster; judiciarycommittee; manuelmiranda; memogate; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
01/22/2004 5:27:07 PM PST
by
NortNork
To: NortNork
OOPSIE DAISY
To: NortNork
Did they ever complete their investiagtion into the 900 FBI files pilfered by hillary?
To: NortNork
Strange... not one word about the 900 FBI files on their opponents the Clintons pilfered and for which they were never punished... could The Boston Fishwrap be... dare I say it? ... biased??
4
posted on
01/22/2004 5:33:46 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: joyce11111
... bypassing a Democratic filibuster that blocked a vote on his nomination for a year because of concerns over his civil rights record -Charlie Savage, Boston GlobeIt is a travesty to keep repeating this lie. Perhaps if they said "trumped-up" concerns, or mentioned that the Mississippi NAACP endorsed Pickering.
To: NortNork
This is obviously criminal -- it's criminal that staffers had access to inside Democrat strategy memos and *still* got blindsided on everything so badly.
6
posted on
01/22/2004 5:48:31 PM PST
by
Ichneumon
To: NortNork
Is that like the secret taping of legislators that Willie Brown was said to have masterminded in Sacremento?
To: NortNork
Pwned. Do we want people who can't secure a computer network running a country???? It is a travesty that such memos are even written on computer systems owned and paid for by taxpayers.
To: NortNork
Charlie Savage didn't mention if any laws were broken. If there weren't any violations of criminal law, then my hat is off to the GOP
operatives (hehehe).
Although my hunch is that the stuff in the newspapers was probably leaked by a democRAT staffer. Same with this Plame-Wilson charade.
5.56mm
9
posted on
01/22/2004 5:59:10 PM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: NortNork
Unfortunately, someone forgot two of the basic rules of intelligence gathering - (1) limit access and (2)do not use the information in a manner that it's origin can be identified. Had they been careful, they could have had a "back door" into the dim's plans for quite a while.
10
posted on
01/22/2004 6:11:29 PM PST
by
herzo
< devils advocate>
Just wondering if those supposed files I am hearing about were put out there on purpouse.
< /devils advocate>
To: NortNork
Think of them as the Pentagon Papers.
They need to be released to the public so we can (try) to understand the decision and thinking processes.
12
posted on
01/22/2004 6:54:41 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: NortNork
Does the DMCA apply?
13
posted on
01/22/2004 6:57:15 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: joyce11111
Woopsie Doodle !!
14
posted on
01/22/2004 6:57:34 PM PST
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: NortNork
Is this a problem with M$, with that threat to National Security, commie, pinko Linux (as so recently, patriotically pointed out by Darl and his brother Daryl of SCO), or some Congressional roll your own software?
What, software security problems? Software privacy trouble? Here? In the U.S.? Where our legislators are always so conscientiously protecting us, the private citizens? I'm shocked!
15
posted on
01/22/2004 7:10:57 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: NortNork
If this is true, then the Republicans sure did blow a golden opportunity. They've been bumbling around aimlessly for 2 years. You'd think with information like that, they'd actually use it to their advantage.
To: Brilliant
My thoughts too. If they had information regarding the Dems tactics for filibustering nominees it did them absolutely no good. For ex. where's Miguel Estrada today?
My inclination is that there is nothing of substance here.
To: NortNork
I was just going to post the article but then I noticed you had already posted it and I noticed it was also alredy posted here by Seamole
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1062769/posts
18
posted on
01/22/2004 9:23:22 PM PST
by
Kaslin
("The way to dishonor a fallen soldier is to quit too early." President George W. Bush)
To: Kaslin
Note to self. Spell check
alredy=already
19
posted on
01/22/2004 9:25:09 PM PST
by
Kaslin
("The way to dishonor a fallen soldier is to quit too early." President George W. Bush)
To: NutCrackerBoy
Where did you get the information that "that the Mississippi NAACP endorsed Pickering"?
That conflicts with this statement from the head of the NAACP declaring "absolute opposition":
From the March 6, 2002 NAACP News: New York - Kweisi Mfume, President & CEO, of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) said today that the Association stands firm in its absolute opposition to the confirmation of Judge Charles Pickering to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at a press conference held here during the Annual Meeting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson