[Rocket1968]

I suspect that security concerns may have played a part in that decision. I find what he said far more important, than his personal appearance. He is a committed pro-lifer.

[Ryan Bailey]

President Bush's words were encouraging indeed. His willingness to stand for life in a pro-death city like Washington, albeit via telephone, is admirable and indicative of a new era of hope for all humanity. Abortion is a cancer on this society ten times worse than slavery, which also is legal.

We are called to consider the similarities between the Roe v. Wade decision and the Dred Scott Decision. Sean Hannity has pointed this fact out very well in his book, 'Let Freedom Ring'. Both of these decisions were based on the misbegotten idea that some human lives, although absolutely equal in every moral sense, are more valuable than others and that the 'propreitor' should wield absolute authority over their property even human property.

This idea of human property, whether in utero or in Negro Servant's Quarters is one apparently alive and well in today's society, for if one life can be summarily dismissed so can any other. It means us too.

To my abortionist/pro-death friends out there; keep on advocating it... you might be the next one aborted. As it is convenient for you to do what you like with innocent unborns, someone might just one day do what they like with you, Why should they not have that "choice".

This is a moral analogy which I hope will be very helpful.