Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wesley Clark: GOP Agenda at Play in Debate
AP ^ | January 23, 2004

Posted on 01/23/2004 12:28:22 PM PST by Shermy

NASHUA, N.H. - Presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday complained that one of the moderators in Thursday night's debate was carrying out a Republican agenda by questioning his Democratic credentials

Brit Hume of Fox News Channel, who worked as both moderator and questioner during the two-hour debate with the seven candidates, pressed Clark about when he had first realized he was a Democrat.

Clark told reporters Friday, "I looked at who was asking the questions, and I think that was part of the Republican agenda in the debate."

Democrats have complained that Fox News Channel shows a Republican bias.

Clark joined the Democratic Party after announcing his bid for the presidency. He has said he voted for Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush but also Democrats Bill Clinton and Al Gore. In defending himself as a Democrat, he cited his pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, pro-environment and pro-labor positions.

"I think voters understand that I am a Democrat," Clark said Friday after an appearance at Rivier College in New Hampshire.

For several weeks, Clark has shared the Granite State with only one other Democrat, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, as their rivals focused on Iowa. In that time, Clark showed gains in the polls, surging to second place in some surveys.

But some eyebrow-raising remarks have taken a toll on Clark's candidacy, and advisers have conceded that he lost all the ground and momentum that he had gained while the rest of the field was in Iowa. They hope he can cling to a respectable showing in the New Hamsphire primary Tuesday, setting the stage for making a stand in the Feb. 3 states, including South Carolina and Arizona.

On Thursday, Clark said he supported a woman's right to have an abortion "as modified by" a 1992 court case that allows states to impose limited restrictions. Clark's comments, at a news conference, marked a far less sweeping position than one he staked out in an interview earlier this month, when he told a New Hampshire newspaper he opposed any legal restriction on abortion at any point during pregnancy.

Clark also has stirred controversy with his comments that the Sept. 11 attacks were preventable and lobbyists make America safer.

During the debate, Hume noted that Clark had voted for Republican presidents and had complimented President Bush and his father before entering the race. "I think it is not unreasonable to ask you when you first noticed that you were a Democrat," Hume said.

In response, Clark told Hume he was not a member of any party when he was in the military and considered joining the Republican Party after he had retired. Clark served in the Army for more than 30 years.

Clark often let his friends and former colleagues in the military tell voters why he should be the next president.

Cris Hernandez, who was part of Clark's security team when Clark served as NATO supreme allied commander, said soldiers have told him, "When you see the boss, you tell him to get us out of Iraq."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; democratdebate; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2004 12:28:23 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy
In response, Clark told Hume he was not a member of any party when he was in the military and considered joining the Republican Party after he had retired.


-yet, he went for the democrat party, hence the question! Duhhhhhh...Wesley, what's so hard about that?
2 posted on 01/23/2004 12:31:47 PM PST by JustPlainJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I thought Peter Jennings asked tougher questions than Britt
3 posted on 01/23/2004 12:32:31 PM PST by Tank-FL (Keep the Faith - VMI Spring Furlough begins March 12 ! Hang in there Albert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
... but also Democrats Bill Clinton and Al Gore...

This is likely a lie. Clark probably voted for Clinton-Gore, not Clinton AND Gore. He was tooling around at Republican fund-raisers before deciding to run for the Democrats' nomination. Does anyone really think that Clark voted against the man on whose behalf he was speaking?
4 posted on 01/23/2004 12:32:57 PM PST by GulliverSwift (Saddam's WMD were sold/hidden while we were bogged down at the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
carrying out a Republican agenda by questioning his Democratic credentials

Why would Republicans care? Except to be thankful that this nutcase is no longer one. Clark's Dem credentials were questioned by his Dem rivals, IIRC. A paranoid meglomaniac. Great.

5 posted on 01/23/2004 12:33:21 PM PST by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Thank goodness none of the other networks, especially ABC and CNN show any bias!!
6 posted on 01/23/2004 12:33:21 PM PST by anoldafvet (Democrats: Making the world safe for terrorists one lie at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
The VRWC strikes again.

I love Bush Jr. for this: he takes responsibility for his own actions. He doesn't blame a conspiracy, or agenda. Has he ever directly accused the liberal media of being liberal? No. At most he has hinted that the coverage in Iraq is not very comprehensive.

God bless Bush Jr.
7 posted on 01/23/2004 12:33:34 PM PST by Loc123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"Presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday complained that one of the moderators in Thursday night's debate was carrying out a Republican agenda by questioning his Democratic credentials."

All these lib/dem candidates are paranoid nutbags.

8 posted on 01/23/2004 12:34:47 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPlainJoe; Shermy
In response, Clark told Hume he was not a member of any party when he was in the military and considered joining the Republican Party after he had retired.

Then why did Clark vote for Nixon.....Reagan...GHWB I.. when he was in the military....all votes for Republican Presidents!

9 posted on 01/23/2004 12:35:37 PM PST by Dog ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Howlin
I think Wes should just take his marbles (does he have any?) and go home then. Don't you?
10 posted on 01/23/2004 12:37:00 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Loc123
God bless Bush Jr.

Please don't refer to W as Jr. He is NOT a Jr. Use among conservatives legitimizes the use of the term in the press. He is called Jr in order to minimize him.

11 posted on 01/23/2004 12:38:09 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
I concede your point.
12 posted on 01/23/2004 12:40:34 PM PST by Loc123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

13 posted on 01/23/2004 12:42:07 PM PST by happydogdesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
General Clark ordered his NATO troops to attack the Russians. The only thing that averted what could have escalated into WWIII was the British Commander refusing to carry out his orders by saying, "I will not start WWIII for you."

14 posted on 01/23/2004 12:43:07 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPlainJoe
The beauty of the secret ballot is that no one besides Wesley Clark really knows how he voted, so he can say whatever he wants to.

Did he become a Democrat because the Clintons had the goods on him, or because he realized that he couldn't run as a Republican in 2004 against the incumbent?

15 posted on 01/23/2004 12:44:05 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Why am I not surprised at his choice of food.
16 posted on 01/23/2004 12:46:10 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: happydogdesign
That image sums up why I could never allow Gen. Clark to become our Commander in Chief.

What are the Democrats thinking?

17 posted on 01/23/2004 12:46:29 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Clark was basically calling himself a Republican in AR because he wanted to run for the Senate. He spoke at conservative Harding University, attended numerous Pulaski County GOP events...It wasn't until he realized that he could run for President as a D that he became one. Many in Little Rock are genuinely surprised that he has come out as a D. The man has no values or principles whatsoever. He is strictly an opportunist.
18 posted on 01/23/2004 12:48:14 PM PST by wylenetheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
After watching Waffly Clark for a few months now, I unmderstand why Hugh Shelton said what he did about Waffly Clark
19 posted on 01/23/2004 12:54:29 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
...one of the moderators in Thursday night's debate was carrying out a Republican agenda by questioning his Democratic credentials

And, of course, the "Republican agenda" means asking (or reporting) anything a Dem would rather not discuss.

20 posted on 01/23/2004 12:55:58 PM PST by PaulJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson