To: AbsoluteJustice
She is being charged with securities fraud No she is not...and this is the point I am trying to make. The fact is there isn't enough evidence to support the charge.
She is being charged with: False Statements, Obsctuction of Justice, Securites Fraud (relating to her comments and the price of her own stock, not ImClone) and Conspiracy
The state (SEC) had nothing in regards to the initial investigation, the charges stem out of her willingness, or lack thereof in cooperating with investigators.
I bet she is aquitted.
To: antaresequity
I mean the original securites fraud/insider trading...
To: antaresequity
I like your "googlebomb links," BTW. ...most excellent and a good idea!
24 posted on
01/23/2004 1:05:27 PM PST by
familyop
(Essayons - motto of good, stable psychotics with a purpose)
To: antaresequity
Thanks for the clarification
26 posted on
01/23/2004 1:06:48 PM PST by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: antaresequity
She is being charged with securities fraud
No she is not...and this is the point I am trying to make. The fact is there isn't enough evidence to support the charge.
She is being charged with: False Statements, Obsctuction of Justice, Securites Fraud (relating to her comments and the price of her own stock, not ImClone) and Conspiracy
The state (SEC) had nothing in regards to the initial investigation, the charges stem out of her willingness, or lack thereof in cooperating with investigators.
I bet she is aquitted.
- I would take that bet. She was charged with obstruction because of the indications of insider trading. They couldn't get Al Capone for racketeering, so they got him for tax evasion. Net result: He went to jail. Martha will do some time. Not a lot, but some. Rightfully so. If she saved money using the info she had, (and it appears she did), that is stealing. A woman of her means shouldn't steal.
47 posted on
01/23/2004 1:28:21 PM PST by
brownsfan
(I didn't leave the democratic party, the democratic party left me.)
To: antaresequity
The fact is there isn't enough evidence to support the charge.Uh, you haven't seen all of the evidence.
To: antaresequity
"She is being charged with
securities fraud"
"No she is not...
"She is being charged with......Securites Fraud (relating to her comments and the price of her own stock, not ImClone) and Conspiracy"
Make up your mind! Is she being charged with securities fraud or not?
176 posted on
01/23/2004 4:16:20 PM PST by
perfect stranger
(No tag line text found. ERROR 7c240000-10e36. This application will be terminated.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson