Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beck_isright
I greatly respect our President for facing up to this problem (OK-maybe facing is a little strong). Give the man credit for making it a public discussion item.

His approach is wrong. There will be no enforcement additives/enhancement, those now here will never return south, family members will come north, and employers will never be properly punished. The consequences will be opposite those advertised, as is usually the case in programs emanating from DC.

The most commonly accepted fallacy is that our borders cannot be safeguarded. Absolutely inaccurate. Some modern technology, some air assets (rotary, fixed wing, and heliostats)along with some increase in border manpower (perhaps double what exists) can shut down at least 95% of the estimated flow. I have studied this extensively and find nothing insurmountable other than a lack of political will. A cost effective fix (short of a physical barrier) could be instituted within six months from the date citizens finally insist on a solution.
136 posted on 01/23/2004 6:54:39 PM PST by petertare (truth, justice and the American way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: petertare
Agreed. We have the capacity to the job. We do not have the poltical will nationwide. We have become a nation of fat lazy slobs who are comfortable as long as our lettuce is cheap and our lawns are cut. I'm sure we can find some 5th century prayers in Latin which were uttered by the citizens of Rome, which are just as applicable today.
140 posted on 01/23/2004 6:58:17 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: petertare
"a lack of political will."

The lack of political will is, because the police state solution is an affront to Freedom and decency. Now do you expect me to believe all those calling for a police state action would not themselves be driven to seek better opportunities and resent the very action they are calling for?

142 posted on 01/23/2004 7:02:14 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: petertare
The most commonly accepted fallacy is that our borders cannot be safeguarded. Absolutely inaccurate.

They can be ---- but the real problem is then the citizens of Mexico who want better lives will have to demand that of their own officials --- that is not what the ruling elites of Mexico want to do --- they don't want changes that would allow the majority to have a piece of that pie --- they like having all the wealth to themselves.

261 posted on 01/24/2004 7:20:08 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson