Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"...strong workplace enforcement", but as of now there isn't any. Why not? It's already the law, all Bush has to do is enforce it. If he needs more money he should go to Congress and ask for it.

He's putting the nation on notice to this very fact, and how he wants to change it.

What would you do, and how would you do it? And how would you deal with the millions already here?

266 posted on 01/24/2004 9:16:03 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: onedoug
He's putting the nation on notice to this very fact, and how he wants to change it.

He's been in offfice for three years but hasn't enforced the law, why is he just now getting around to putting us on notice? That's the whole point, if he's been unwilling to enforce the law in the past there's no reason to believe he'll do so in the future.

What would you do, and how would you do it? And how would you deal with the millions already here?

Simple, I'd enforce the law, primarily through employer sanctions and cutting off all benefits. Many would self-deport on their own. The illegal Pakistanis proved that's what would happen when the government finally made a half-hearted attempt at enforcing the law against them. They voluntarily left by the thousands.

The CLEAR Act in Congress is another important piece of legislation I support. It would utilize the resources of the police by encouraging them to turn over all illegals they come into contact with to BICE.

As Eisenhower proved in 1954, enforcement works. As the amnesty of 1986 demonstrated, rewarding them does not.

273 posted on 01/24/2004 10:34:41 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson