Posted on 01/23/2004 6:26:39 PM PST by Happy2BMe
Bush Brings Back Big (And Expensive) Government Since President Bush took office, the federal government's domestic civilian workforce has increased by more than 79,000 jobs, nearly a 5 percent increase. And the number of government workers paid at least $130,000 annually has tripled. Much of the increase came with the creation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security two years ago. But the nation's war on terrorism does not account for all of the rise. The Department of Health and Human Services, for example, has added 1,445 employees since President Bill Clinton left office. "We are seeing a general growth in the size of government. That is just a fact," said Bob Moffit, former deputy assistant health secretary during the Reagan administration and now a scholar at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "And the increases did not all go to Homeland Security. The rise in federal discretionary spending, frankly, has been breathtaking." A study of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management records by Scripps Howard News Service has found that the domestic federal workforce grew from 1,697,753 people in September 2000 to 1,777,217 in September 2003, the most recent information available. That is an increase of 79,464 people, more than the population of Dubuque, Iowa, and nearly identical to the seating capacity of Giants Stadium. Federal workers paid $130,000 annually _ the highest wage category reported in personnel records _ rose from 6,249 people receiving at least $812 million in 2000 to at least 21,178 people earning more than $2.7 billion. Both the number of top-wage earners and their aggregate salaries more than tripled in three years. The White House on Thursday defended the increases. "As the president made clear in the State of the Union message, we must continue to give Homeland Security and law enforcement every tool they need to defend us," said Erin Healy, assistant White House press secretary. "That includes the need for passenger screeners, customs inspectors and border patrol officers dedicated to keeping America safe from terrorist attacks." The study found the largest component of federal expansion is attributable to the creation of Homeland Security, with 152,741 employees. Most of its workers _ like the U.S. Coast Guard _ were transferred to Homeland Security from other federal agencies. The largest single source of new jobs came with the creation of the Transportation Security Administration employing 59,106 people, most of whom work at airports and other domestic entry ports. But many other departments have also enjoyed substantial gains, including 10,623 new jobs at the Veterans Affairs Department, 6,501 positions at Agriculture, 1,649 new jobs at the State Department and 3,562 additional workers at the Interior Department. Even the departments of Labor and Housing and Urban Development _ federal agencies historically disliked by many conservatives _ grew slightly in the last three years. Other departments showed apparent declines, but the wholesale transfer of many federal agencies to Homeland Security accounted for most of the reductions.
Congressional Republicans said they are disturbed by the federal workforce increases and the likely $500 billion budget deficit next fiscal year. "I think it's very difficult for Republicans to maintain the mantle, or be able to claim the mantle, of fiscal conservatism," said Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo. "Some say it's because of the war that we have to spend more. I say, it's because of the war that we have to look at all the other things we do and cut back." The growth of federal employment under Bush reversed a general trend in government downsizing that occurred under former President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s and under former President Bill Clinton during the 1990s. "During the Reagan administration, there was a decided emphasis on scaling back the size of the domestic institutions of government," Moffit said. "Reagan wanted to make the federal workforce more competitive with the private sector." Moffit said Reagan cut about 100,000 jobs and Clinton, who campaigned on a pledge to reinvent government, cut another 300,000 positions. Previous studies by Scripps Howard found that Clinton presided over the largest decline in federal jobs in modern times, but that many of the cuts were among low-paid, blue-collar positions. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were "outsourced" under federal contracts. "The federal government is now contracting out more than it did at the end of the Cold War; everything from fence painting and lawn mowing at defense bases to management analysis and computer programming," said Paul Light, a federal workforce expert at the Brookings Institution. Light said he is aware of the recent rise in the direct federal payroll, but warned the Scripps Howard study significantly understates the true public sector-related job growth in the last three years. Many more jobs were created through private contracts signed by the Bush administration, he said. "The federal government has added more than 1 million jobs to the indirect, or off-budget, payroll," Light said. The Scripps Howard study found that federal jobs growth has occurred unevenly throughout the nation. The largest increase occurred in Florida with 10,788 new federal positions, the District of Columbia with 6,135 new jobs and Texas with 5,860 new jobs. Three states have suffered declines: Indiana with a reduction of 1,031 civilian federal jobs, Ohio with 363 fewer jobs and a 117-job decline in Mississippi. The creation of the Transportation Security Administration fueled much of the government growth. But these jobs have been distributed very unevenly throughout the nation since they occur mostly at major airports. The biggest TSA winners were Florida with 6,514 Transportation Security Administration posts followed by California with 5,902, Texas with 4,930, Virginia with 3,898 and New York with 3,763.
By THOMAS HARGROVE
Jan 23, 2004, 08:20 Big government is back.
Class dismissed!
That's pretty good - much less than the private sector.
Where are conservatives headed in this country?
The Republican Party always stood for "The Small Government Party." When are we going to start acting like it.
We should alert the captain to bring the ship back on course. Beginning with the deficit.
A smaller, limited government that doesn't regulate the people to death and use money that doesn't exist is our historical foundation.
If you don't agree with this, you don't have the right to stand up and call yourself a "Conservative."
President Bush - please retain your support base in this critical year and return the course of the Republican Party.
Fight against compromise and exercise restraint and courage and spare future generations from unnecessary spending.
Our real goal is individual freedom, not big government.
America needs more piano players.
Do you have a good rendition of "It's A Grand Old Flag" in your repertoire?
Yes, he does. What he and a lot of folks around here just don't seem to get is that some of us busted our asses to get him elected. I won't make that mistake again. Burn me once, and all that.
I'm afraid that's quite misleading/dishonest. HHS has had increased duties to counter threats of bioterrorism. Of course, I don't know if all of these employee increases are all attributed to this, but dismissing HHS as not being involved in Homeland Security indicates this person doesn't have a grasp of the issues he is writing about.
I do agree that discretionary spending must be brought under control. We'll see how well Bush's 1% increase holds up as it goes through Congress.
Keep you eye on the Grand Old Flag (foot is dancing right along now . . )
:~)
Kinda, I spend a lot of time explainly that an American conservative supports the orginal intent of the Constitution. That seems to blow the cool aid drinking Republican minds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.