Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer reportedly seized from Frist's office
Knoxnews ^ | January 24, 2004 | Richard Powelson

Posted on 01/24/2004 7:15:17 PM PST by Dan Evans

Computer reportedly seized from Frist's office Democrats say their computers were infiltrated by GOP staffers

WASHINGTON - Federal investigators reportedly have seized a staff computer in Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's office in a probe to find Republican aides who improperly accessed Democrats' memos on opposing judicial nominees.

Nick Smith, a spokesman for Frist, R-Tenn., would not confirm or deny Friday if an office computer or hard drive was taken by investigators representing the office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms.

"We're not commenting on the issue while it's under investigation," Smith said.

The Boston Globe reported Thursday that federal experts studying any improper access of Democratic senators' computer records had confiscated several computers or computer hard drives of the Judiciary Committee and one in Frist's office. The article also identified a Frist staff member - Manuel Miranda - as being under scrutiny for his computer use.

Smith in Frist's office confirmed that Miranda is a Frist employee but is on a leave of absence. Asked if any of Frist's staff computers or computer servers had been seized, Smith said: "I cannot comment on the details of the investigation."

Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, in late November confirmed that the ongoing probe has found Republican staff wrongdoing. One unidentified staff member was suspended with pay pending the outcome of the investigation, Hatch said.

The office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms, which is using computer experts of the U.S. Secret Service to investigate, expects to finish its analysis of who did what within three to four weeks, an office spokesman said. The final report will be given to Hatch and the committee's senior Democrat, Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

Tracy Schmaler, spokeswoman for the committee's Democrats, said the Democrats share Hatch's outrage over the computer security violations. "This is unethical and immoral behavior that cannot and should not be tolerated," she said.

Committee Democrats learned late last year that their computer access codes were not set up properly and some Republican staffers knew about the glitch and took advantage of it for two years to view and copy sensitive files relating to the Democratic opposition to some of President Bush's judicial nominees.

Schmaler said Republicans could not justify improper access to restricted Democratic correspondence that was mistakenly unprotected by passwords. Doing so, she said, would be like "blaming the victim whose car was broken into by a burglar for leaving the trunk unlocked."

Frist, who has completed one year as Senate majority leader, often criticized Democrats last year for repeatedly blocking several of Bush's judicial nominees.

But Leahy said Democrats are allowing more of Bush's nominees to be approved than Republicans approved when Democrat Bill Clinton was president.

Leahy criticized the "cyber theft" of confidential Democratic memoranda.

"This invasion was perpetrated by Republican employees both on and off the committee," he said without naming names. "Members of the Republican staff took things that did not belong to them and passed them around and on to people outside of the Senate. This is no small mistake. It is a serious breach of trust, morals, and possibly the rules and regulations governing the U.S. Senate."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: estradamemo; frist; manuelmiranda; memogate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/24/2004 7:15:18 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Did they go in with weapons drawn like the do if it was a normal citizen accuses of computer crimes?
2 posted on 01/24/2004 7:16:27 PM PST by DMCA (TITLE 17 Chapter 1 Sec 107)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Notice they never investigate leaks from Democrats
3 posted on 01/24/2004 7:25:57 PM PST by GeronL (miss me?? I've been gone... you mean you didn't even notice?? wwaaaaaaaaaaa!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
The fact that this was a post at DU notwithstanding...I think I'll wait for official confirmation that the story is legitimate.

Hey folks, let's post our own stuff here...this is a Conservative site.
4 posted on 01/24/2004 7:32:51 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
>>The fact that this was a post at DU notwithstanding...I think I'll wait for official confirmation that the story is legitimate.

Drudge is linking the original story - to the website of the Knoxville News Sentinel. Are they the DU now? I must have missed the memo on that one...
5 posted on 01/24/2004 7:37:39 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
When Sean Hannity broke this, he implied that his source was a DEM.

Leahy is lying...nothing new with that.

6 posted on 01/24/2004 7:40:51 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Tracy Schmaler, spokeswoman for the committee's Democrats, said the Democrats share Hatch's outrage over the computer security violations. "This is unethical and immoral behavior that cannot and should not be tolerated," she said, "UNLESS OF COURSE, WE DO IT, IN WHICH CASE ITS OK."

You know, you democrat schmucks should consult with someone savvy with regard to computers, such as Al Gore, before you post sensitive files where they may be read by people you don't want reading them. Perhaps "Wally" from Dilbert could help you out....

7 posted on 01/24/2004 7:48:05 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yooper
I'd like to know if Republican staffers "hacked" into dem files. That would bother me.

But it sounds like they took advantage of dem stupidity. I have no problem with that, really.

8 posted on 01/24/2004 8:07:27 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
I read "unethical" and "immoral" but not "illegal." If the computer illiterate Democrats left their war plans on an unsecure network, that's the equivalent of leaving them in "plain view." I simply don't see what they are complaining about. Do they leave sensitive national security documents equally unprotected? That is what I would like to see investigated!
9 posted on 01/24/2004 8:17:50 PM PST by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Smells like Dem excuse to try and get a look at Republican data..
10 posted on 01/24/2004 8:19:45 PM PST by Havoc ("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DMCA
Manuel Miranda is PROBABLY a Democrat plant.
11 posted on 01/24/2004 8:21:03 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rebel_yell2
I read "unethical" and "immoral" but not "illegal." If the computer illiterate Democrats left their war plans on an unsecure network, that's the equivalent of leaving them in "plain view."

I think that might depend on whether the network was public or not. If they accessed it without authorization (particularly if they knew they would not be welcome to access it) they could be considered in the same light as someone entering the closed door of an unlocked office and going through files they knew were off limits simply because it wasn't locked at the time. But if the network was available for public access, the Dems have no reason to gripe and the Pubbies did nothing wrong.

12 posted on 01/24/2004 8:27:55 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Frist frisked. [Say that 3 times fast.]
13 posted on 01/24/2004 8:30:46 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Another article from the Boston Globe

US Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Staff members under investigation for serious violation

14 posted on 01/24/2004 8:40:51 PM PST by deport (BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
I'm sure this will get the same treatment that Democratic theft of the Republican redistricting plans in Texas, and the misappropriation of FBI files during the Clinton Administration got.
15 posted on 01/24/2004 8:42:37 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

Hey folks, let's post our own stuff here...this is a Conservative site.

What you mean "post our own stuff"? If bad news is coming down the pike you want know about so you don't get blindsided by your Dem friends.

16 posted on 01/24/2004 8:50:34 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rebel_yell2
I remember when the Clinton White House was caught rifling through the 900 FBI files on former staffers and other Republicans, Clinton blamed it on a computer mix-up. He said it was the Republicans fault for leaving a file with all those names that somehow got confused with the new hires. Everybody just laughed it off.
17 posted on 01/24/2004 8:57:34 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I dont care what drudge is doing.

How about posting editorials, articles and stories from news organizations that provide something of substance, not supposition and maybe, mighta, coulda, sources say, etc, etc.

I think some of you just like posting and then barking at slanted news pieces versus promoting conservative ideas and principles.

18 posted on 01/24/2004 9:29:56 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Forgive me if I am not dissuaded by your narcissistic view of posting insight but this is an election year for the White House.....absolutely nothing should be blindsiding any of us.
19 posted on 01/24/2004 9:33:07 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
BTW: Stop trolling DU for articles to post.
20 posted on 01/24/2004 9:34:47 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson