Skip to comments.
Southwest Airlines Discrimination Lawsuit-"eenie, meenie, minie moe"-SW did not discriminate
kshb.com ^
Posted on 01/24/2004 8:03:01 PM PST by chance33_98
Southwest Airlines Discrimination Lawsuit
A jury in Kansas City, Kansas Federal Court says Southwest Airlines did not discriminate against two African American passengers.
Regardless of the verdict, the two Kansas City sisters who brought the complaint maintain that they feel a flight attendant made a racial rhyme at their expense. Three years ago, Louise Sawyer and her sister were the last two to board a flight. In an effort to get the two passengers to their seats, first year Southwest Airlines flight attendant Jennifer Cundiff used a widely used rhyme:
She said "eenie, meenie, minie moe get a seat we've got to go."
Cundiff says she was trying to be humorous and entertaining.
However, Sawyer says, "if she wanted to produce humor, she could have found something better to say than that." Cundiff says she didnt know the history of the rhyme. But what was a nursery rhyme to one person, was a racial epithet to another. An old rhyme used to include a racial slur.
Louise says her sister became so upset she experienced physical and emotional injury.
The sisters then talked about it and sent a complaint to Southwest. Had the airline given the sisters an apology and offered to remedy the situation Louise says they would have moved on and refrained from bringing a complaint.
The jury deliberated only 45 minutes after the two day trial. Jurors didn't reward the compensatory or punitive damage the sisters asked for.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: swa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: chance33_98
Wow, court excercises common sense.
You might wanna repost this in latest/breaking.
To: chance33_98
These two ladies caused harm to SW. Lawyer fees, bad publicity, etc.
Shouldn't they pay SW for the expense and suffering?
To: chance33_98
A clear thinking jury. Amazing. There maybe some hope....
Prairie
4
posted on
01/24/2004 8:13:27 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(God Bless and Protect the Allied Troops. And the families here at home---they are soldiers too.)
To: chance33_98
Let's see, moe and go rhyme. Yep, that's definitely racial.
5
posted on
01/24/2004 8:14:16 PM PST
by
bereanway
To: chance33_98
Gold diggers get the shaft and rightly so. I hope the case wasn't pro bono.
6
posted on
01/24/2004 8:14:36 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: chance33_98
I'm watching the AIRLINE reality mini-series on A&E. It seems SW has a good set of employees but the mangiest gaggle of passengers always looking to get a free ticket, a free hotel room, a scratched bag repaired or they threaten to sue.
7
posted on
01/24/2004 8:17:17 PM PST
by
Procyon
To: chance33_98
We should have as the UK has loser pays, but 3/4s of the lawyers would be out of work and sqeeling like broke dick dogs.
8
posted on
01/24/2004 8:17:50 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: chance33_98
The jury deliberated only 45 minutes after the two day trial. Jurors didn't reward the compensatory or punitive damage the sisters asked for.Too bad the sisters don't have to pay Southwest compensatory and punitive damages
and the cost of their "lawsuit.
9
posted on
01/24/2004 8:21:03 PM PST
by
auboy
To: chance33_98
All it takes is one politically correct judge to clog up the courts for three years with a frivolous action like this. One of the "offended" parties claimed she had a "grand mal" seizure when she got home. This is a serious medical incident, and yet, curiously, the other sister did not seek medical attention. Just more lying scum looking to cash in on a quick settlement for their "victimhood." I'm proud of Cundiff and Southwest for standing up to these thugettes and their scumbag lawyer. If all corporations were like them and Denny's, Jesse Jackson would be out of business.
To: boomop1
Eenie, meenie, minee, moe
Gold diggers get the shaft and rightly so
11
posted on
01/24/2004 8:32:24 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
To: bereanway
Let's see, moe and go rhyme. Yep, that's definitely racial. Guess the Southwest filght attendant should have said,
"If the seat fit, you must sit."
12
posted on
01/24/2004 8:44:46 PM PST
by
gg188
To: chance33_98
If you asked my son to complete the rhyme, he would probably say "Eenie, meenie, minie moe. Catch a tiger by the toe. If he hollers, let him go. Eenie, meenie, minie moe." That's the way I learned it, and taught it him. It wasn't until after I had taught it to him, that learned how it originally went. Being white doesn't mean we were spoon-fed racism. And anyone who thinks it does, is a racist.
13
posted on
01/24/2004 9:17:00 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Temporary tagline. Applied to State of New Jersey for permanent tagline (12/24/03).)
To: bereanway
The next line of the nursery rhyme is, "Catch a tiger by the toe." In many versions, the word isn't "tiger", but instead is a racial epithet.
14
posted on
01/24/2004 9:17:50 PM PST
by
Piranha
(.)
To: Piranha
I was taught the old way but I never considered it offensive as it wasn't said for that purpose.
15
posted on
01/24/2004 9:31:31 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Piranha
One cannot be expected to research the origins of a childrens rhyme before repeating it. I have chanted that rhyme using tiger more than a hundred times and never imagined that it is offensive to anyone (except maybe tigers).
Just because someone is offended, does not imply offense was meant. If it did, then nothing could be said, because almost everything will offend someone.
16
posted on
01/24/2004 9:49:24 PM PST
by
Klein-Bottle
(The liberated Iraqi people will not forgive the liberals who want them to remain enslaved.)
To: Procyon
Cundiff says she was trying to be humorous and entertaining SW's employees are notorious for making jokes. If you fly SWA, you should expect to laugh at least once during the flight. I find their humor quite charming.
17
posted on
01/24/2004 10:01:36 PM PST
by
staytrue
To: Klein-Bottle
Exactly. I'm 35 years old, and until I heard of this ridiculous case last year, I had NEVER heard a different version of this rhyme. It was always "tiger." I had no idea any other racist version existed, and neither did this flight attendant.
The plaintiff was so upset it caused her physical and emotional injury???? Give me a break! Nice to see justice was served.
18
posted on
01/24/2004 10:02:53 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Then: "Ask not what your country can do for you" Now: "You sit down. You had your say.")
To: BykrBayb
It wasn't until after I had taught it to him, that learned how it originally went. Being white doesn't mean we were spoon-fed racism. And anyone who thinks it does, is a racist. I learned the non-racist version as a kid too. I'm 45 years old and it wasn't until a year ago that someone told me that the rhyme formerly used the "N" word. I was dismayed.
19
posted on
01/24/2004 10:08:16 PM PST
by
arm958
To: staytrue
Just a couple of jerks playing "Wheel of Fortune" with the judicial system. There's a breed of lawyers who love this kind of stuff, and if the lawyer had performed the primary tasks of lawyers today, jurisdiction-shopping and jury profiling, the sisters would have come away with a nice settlement. Isn't it great that two people can take up six months of time and two days in a court room to see if they can extort money from a company? And people wonder why businesses are off-shoring.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson