Posted on 01/24/2004 8:23:06 PM PST by Spiff
By a margin of nearly 3-1, the Arizona Republican Party on Saturday endorsed a resolution in support of the Protect Arizona Now ballot (PAN) initiative. The vote of 317-109 in favor of the resolution -- a 74-percent majority -- took place at the annual state Republican convention in Mesa.
Despite the overwhelming support, AZ GOP chairman Bob Fannin called for a vote of the precinct captains in attendance after he could not decipher a clear majority by voice vote.
A citizen’s grassroots effort, PAN is an attempt to ensure integrity at the voting booths of Arizona while protecting taxpayers from the burdensome social costs associated with illegal aliens. Hospitals in the Southwestern states have closed down because of overwhelming expenses incurred due to illegal aliens. Home invasions in Phoenix are up 140 percent. Nearly a third of prison inmates are illegal aliens. AHCCCS costs have quintupled, from $200 million a year to $1.2 billion annually. The petition aims at guarding “against abuses of the elective franchise” and “against the abuse or fraud of our public benefit system.” If the initiative goes on the November ballot and gets passed by voters, proof of citizenship would be required in order to vote or receive some social services.
State and national Republican leadership is opposed to the Protect Arizona Now initiative. But virtually all the polling on the issue (by GOPUSA/Arizona, KAET-TV, ProjectUSA, News/Insight, and FrontPage Magazine) indicates support levels of 85 percent or higher. It’s a story of disconnect between party leadership and citizens.
Among those speaking in favor of the resolution were PAN senior advisers Randy Graf and Russell Pearce, both conservative members of the Arizona House of Representatives, District 18 House candidate J.T. Ready, Joseph Sweeny of Eloy and State Rep. Karen Johnson.
Rep. Graf said, “This initiative protects the sacred right of voting in this state. This has nothing to do with any federal law or guest worker program. It is simply about protecting citizens.”
Pearce and Johnson said that PAN aims to uphold the rule of law.
The lone voice of dissent during debate came from liberal State Sen. Carolyn Allen of District 8, who said endorsement of PAN would hurt George Bush’s chances of re-election. District 7 precinct captains were the only congressional unit voting against the PAN endorsement. Much of the opposition also came from Legislative District 11, including former AZ GOP executive director Ann Lynch, who yelled out in opposition.
“We want to re-elect George Bush and Dick Cheney in this state,” Sen. Allen said. “If this passes, we will suffer. The White House is very concerned about this initiative. This is not going to help our president in this state.”
Ready encouraged Republicans to view PAN from a different angle -- from the people’s perspective.
“Going against this resolution will only help (Mexico’s) Presidente Fox,” Ready said. “Why shouldn’t we pass this? After all, Blockbuster Video requires two forms of ID to rent a video. I support the president, but the question is if he supports the U.S. Constitution.”
Ready’s inference was to President Bush’s proposed -- and highly unpopular -- Temporary Worker Program. Cong. Jeff Flake and Jim Kolbe and U.S. Sen. John McCain have also introduced a similar bill for a guest worker program.
A congressional district by district breakdown of the vote on the resolution went as follows:
CD1 -- 59-12, in favor
CD2 -- 50-9, in favor
CD3 -- 16-13, in favor
CD4 -- 8-0, in favor
CD5 -- 24-16, in favor
CD6 -- 95-4, in favor
CD7 -- 35-11, opposed
CD8 -- 54-20, in favor
Earlier in the meeting, U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl addressed the topic of illegal immigration, and Rep. Pearce found merit with his remarks. Kyl said he has spent a lot of time discussing the issue with President Bush, Vice-president Dick Cheney and Attorney General John Ashcroft.
“My suggestion,” Kyl said, “is as Republicans, we take a breath, gather the facts and not criticize the president other than in our opinions. I have seen the polls, and virtually all Americans oppose amnesty. The problem is how you define it. We try hard on the border to keep illegal immigrants out. We could do a better job, but we are winking at those hiring illegals. There is a disrespect for the rule of law. It’s not good for everybody or the taxpayers who end up subsidizing lower wages.”
In response to Kyl’s remarks, Pearce said: “He talked about the rule of law and no amnesty. He could not have done more for our issue. He codified our position.”
Fannin and other speakers encouraged Republicans not to divide over the immigration issue.
In your FACE!!! We're mad as hell and we're not going to put up with this invasion anymore!!
Dennis Durband, Editor
The Arizona Conservative
24 January 2004
Arizona Republican Party Chairman Bob Fannin on Saturday repeatedly called on members of his party to avoid division over the border controversy, during the annual AZ GOP convention in Mesa. However, after the general meeting, Fannin used the occasion of an executive board meeting to chastise district chairman for not supporting President George Bush's proposed Temporary Worker Program.
The move backfired on Fannin as angry district chairman revolted. Fannin's longevity as state party chairman beyond this second year of his two-year term is now very much in doubt.
Former Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives Jeff Groscost, now chairman of Legislative District 18, told Fannin he is the problem. Fannin was told that instead of opposing the vast majority of Republicans who support the Protect Arizona Now initiative and who oppose temporary and guest worker programs, he should use his position to relay that information to the White House.
Angry district chairmen believe that Fannin is out of touch with the grassroots precinct committeemen and that they cannot depend on him. Some of the chairmen discussed finding a replacement for Fannin, whose term expires in a year. The name of former Governor Fife Symington came up in a discussion of the volunteer chairman's position.
Earlier in the day, Fannin had opened the general meeting with these remarks: "We are on a roll! Hasn't this been a great week! The president of the United States was here, and he makes everybody happy with his down-to-earth ways. One way to keep on a roll is to stay united. We have such great principles. The only way the Democrats can beat us is if they can divide us."
Before adjourning the general meeting, Fannin issued another call for unity. By then, 74 percent of the precinct captains had voted to endorse the Protect Arizona Now initiative -- in direct opposition to the White House and GOP leadership. There has been a disconnect between party leadership and the people ever since the PAN effort launched last year.
Fannin's plea for unity lasted for only a few more moments. Shortly thereafter, the border issue boiled over in the executive committee meeting.
It's not like Saturday's 317-109 vote in favor of PAN was anything new to Fannin and Republican leadership. Just two weeks earlier, the Maricopa County GOP had endorsed the PAN initiative as well.
I get the same impression. :|
haha
I mean when they come over the border... shouldn't we do more than play the theme song from Rawhide??
Go PAN (not Vincente's Party either) go
Looks like they will need prescription strength by the time you folks are done!
Those people are locked out of the Texas GOP now, which is a rich-kids' alumnae party now. You're nobody unless you're a business executive, a rich corporate lawyer, an Ivy League or Texas alum, or someone's heir.
Now you have to go take a shower.
Pandering to illegal aliens will not help Bush win in AZ or any other state. Calling Karl Rove. Your base is speaking. You might want to listen to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.