To: DelaWhere
This is unbelievable. I know some on this forum will say that the Radcliffs entered into a "voluntary contract" and hence deserve no special consideration.
Myself, I vote for common sense. I think the HOA should be sued for financial terrorism.
5 posted on
01/25/2004 5:56:11 AM PST by
sauropod
(Graduate, Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training)
To: sauropod
Myself, I vote for common sense. I think the HOA should be sued for financial terrorism. To actually have lost foreclosure without the couple being advised to pay the relatively paltry sum is ridiculous. Did they ~want~ to lose their home and be martyrs to some principle? Common sense would have been to pay the $120, or later, $1,900 before it ever came to anything like this. ~Anyone~ pressed can come up with that much rather than lose everything.
To: sauropod
"financial terrorism"
good phrase. I'm going to use it. thanks.
131 posted on
01/25/2004 7:15:10 AM PST by
Taffini
(I like Tony Soprano even though he is a fat boy.)
To: sauropod
Financial Terrorism indeed!! This is beyond ludicrous.
213 posted on
01/25/2004 2:08:59 PM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South!!)
To: sauropod
I hate the HOA's I had to go to a hearing where I live because I leave my garage door open to much and I park in the driveway to much...They say the next time I park in my driveway I risk being towed away! HOA Sucks!
264 posted on
01/25/2004 5:53:59 PM PST by
missyme
To: sauropod
I know what I'd do, and I don't care if I got sent to jail for it...they could take the house...in a burnt to a crisp condition!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson