[PhiKapMom]

I thought so too until I had to go observe the Dean blog after the Iowa caucus -- guess what -- some of their posts were word for word what I see on here by posters. The same can be said of the others campaigns.

How can you tell the difference? The negativity of the weekend by "new" posters was unbelieveable. Are you telling me that all these "New" posters and screen names on here just happened to be Anti-Bush but not from the liberals?

Coincidence and I are not on the same page!

[George W. Bush]

I thought so too until I had to go observe the Dean blog after the Iowa caucus -- guess what -- some of their posts were word for word what I see on here by posters. The same can be said of the others campaigns.

Well, I wish you'd posted a thread or flagged some of us to it. I'd like to see the evidence for 'word for word' postings myself.

Maybe the moderators didn't catch 'em quick enough. But I saw a number dispatched, one vaporized by JimRob himself with considerable verve and humor.

We're an open forum. I'm saying that if the disruptors come here, they get zapped quick. And the nonsense of them sneaking back in with multiple IDs is considerably reduced over what we once had.

Besides, do you really think Dim campaigns have time for us? It would be more likely that DU and others are toying with us. The actual Candidates Of Evil Democrat presidential campaigns seem to be a little preoccupied in New Hampshire.

I just don't see that their time would be well-spent here at FR during the last days of their primary. Can't see that anyone here is converting to vote for any Dim except our NH independent-registered rightwingers who plan to vote Lieberman or Dean. And I see no indication that any of those who have so announced their intent are disruptors or agents provocateurs. Just good FReepers with different strategies for intruding on the Dim primary. (IMO, they'll probably cancel each others' votes out.)