Posted on 01/27/2004 9:00:15 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
When the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Texas' law against sodomy last year, at least one justice foresaw the likes of Brian Barnard. Justice Antonin Scalia warned that the ruling would unleash a wave of challenges to state laws against ''bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity.'' Sure enough, Barnard, a civil rights attorney, has brought a lawsuit challenging Utah's ban on polygamy. And some legal experts say the case could have a fighting chance because of the Supreme Court's gay-sex ruling. The federal lawsuit, filed Jan. 12, involves a married couple, identified only as G. Lee Cook and D. Cook, and a woman, J. Bronson, who wanted to enter into a plural marriage but were denied a marriage license by Salt Lake County clerks. Citing the high court's decision last June in Lawrence vs. Texas, the lawsuit claims the county violated the plaintiffs' right to privacy with regard to intimate matters and trampled on their First Amendment right to religious freedom. Barnard has not disclosed his clients' faith except to say that polygamy is a ''sincere and deeply held religious major tenet.'' Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Lawrence case, arguing that overturning the Texas law would open the door to challenges of Utah's polygamy ban. ''We have a long line of cases saying that the [institution] of marriage is the bedrock of society. Therefore, states have a compelling interest in regulating and controlling marriage,'' he said. But at least one legal expert said Lawrence's logic leads to the legalization of polygamy, since the high court held that morality is not a strong enough justification for the state to ban a practice deemed unpopular or immoral by the majority. ''It's not a case people can sniff at,'' said Richard G. Wilkins, a law professor at Brigham Young University. AP
A Constitutional Amendment can stop it. Probably nothing else has the power to do so.
Polygamy is abhorrent to both the left (women's rights) and the right.
Polygamy ain't goin nowhere.
BUMP
Is it not ironic, that the law allows sleeping around--even orgies-yet forbids a form of marriage?
Really?? I think King David would have disagreed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.