I bet she does too ...
Remember when the libs floated a story around the time of Gore's attempted theft of the 2000 election that O'Connor had been considering retiring, but wanted to stay on long enough to have Bush appoint a "conservative" successor? I think it's more likely she is trying to wait out Bush's administration so she will not be replaced by someone conservative.
We all talk about how important it is to get Bush's choices approved, yet it looks like we are needing antidotes to O'Connor (a Reagan appointee) and Souter (a Bush 41 appointee) as much as for Clinton's and Carter's appointees.