Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Mac Collins: It's All About Jobs
The Small Business Survival Committee Website ^ | January 16, 2004 | Mac Collins

Posted on 01/28/2004 9:40:39 AM PST by andy1114

There is no more important issue facing our economy today than the creation of manufacturing jobs. All of us are painfully aware of the loss of too many American manufacturing jobs. Over the past three years the United States has lost over three million manufacturing jobs – with an average of 60,000 job losses per month over the past two years. Some of these jobs have disappeared due to increased production efficiencies, but many more have been relocated overseas.

If we do not act to protect the remaining manufacturing jobs our nation faces a perilous economic future. Michigan’s Governor Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat, put it into perspective when she said, “We’re not just creating products; we’re building lives. Manufacturing jobs are largely responsible for creating the middle class in Michigan and the United States, providing opportunities for millions of families nationwide to participate in the American Dream. The manufacturing industry itself is the backbone of our national economy and defense. We simply cannot allow our manufacturing nucleus to erode as it has so dramatically done in the past several years.”

There are many reasons for this loss of manufacturing jobs, some of which we in Congress cannot control. But there are some factors over which we do have control and on which we must take firm action. These include excessive corporate tax rates, overburdening regulation and the high cost of litigation protection.

The American Competition Enhancement Act of 2003, which I have introduced, will address one of these causes: excessive corporate tax rates by ultimately providing an across the board tax cut of 5 percent for all corporations. Specifically, the ACE act will cut the corporate tax rate by 3 points in 2004, initially lowering the corporate rate to 32 percent. Three years later, the ACE Act would cut the tax rate by an additional 2 points, lowering the rate for corporations to 30 percent in 2007.

Such tax relief is clearly needed. For some time now, to remain competitive in the global marketplace, our trading partners have been reducing tax rates on the businesses that employ their workers. Many countries, including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Poland and Turkey, have cut their corporate tax rates drastically – some by 10 percent or more.

The top average corporate tax rate for governments in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has dropped from a rate of 41 percent in 1986 to 30.9 percent in 2003. Compare this with the United States where the corporate rate has remained unchanged at 35 percent. When state and local taxes are added on top of this rate, the U.S. corporate tax rate averages 40 percent – which is more than 9 percentage points higher than the OECD average.

While other countries have been lowering corporate tax rates and more effectively competing for business and ultimately jobs, the United States has failed to respond, and American workers have suffered as those statistics I cited earlier dramatically illustrate.

In fact, instead of freeing American businesses and our workers from non-competitive tax rates, this Congress has moved in the opposite direction by making our tax laws increasingly more complex and expensive for both businesses and individuals to comply with and passing legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley bill that created even more red tape for American businesses.

Throughout the Twentieth Century, the United States competed aggressively in the world market, and a result our competitors responded. Now, to remain competitive, Congress MUST act again, and we MUST begin by reducing corporate tax rates that have become a choke collar on American workers, restricting our ability to compete with other workers in the world market. We know that our American workers are the greatest workers in the world so there is little doubt about the favorable outcome of such competition, if only the Congress will level the playing field.

Some critics will say that we cannot have the ACE Act, but the truth is that American workers cannot afford the alternative – a continuation of these tax rates that restrict, limit and choke their ability to compete.

Right now, we are seeing the favorable effect on the economy of the tax cuts we passed last year. The recovery is gaining steam and employers are keeping the employees they have. Businesses are making capital expenditures that will create new jobs and increase their profits which, in turn, means more economic growth, more jobs, more exports, more production, and, ultimately, more dollars flowing to the Federal Treasury. Let us learn from history and pass meaningful tax relief for businesses to stimulate even more economic growth and, in turn, increase the funds in consumers’ pockets, which ultimately will mean more dollars for the Treasury of the United States.

American businesses, especially American manufacturers, face many challenges in remaining competitive in the global marketplace, and one of the biggest is our excessive corporate tax rates. The ACE Act would address this fundamental issue and enable American workers in all sectors, including manufacturing, to once again compete in the world market. Passage of this bill would also instill confidence in our manufacturing industry and encourage them to keep jobs here instead of exporting them overseas.

I will urge my colleagues in the House to consider the actions of others around the world, to consider history’s lessons, and, most importantly, to consider the negative effect our current, excessive corporate tax rate is having on workers in their own districts. I have considered all this and am determined to level the playing field and free American workers from this choke collar of taxation. This Congress must act and provide much needed relief for all American businesses that employ our people. It is past time for us to pass solid, meaningful tax legislation that supports the American worker and helps create more jobs.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: manufacturing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2004 9:40:42 AM PST by andy1114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: andy1114
It is about jobs. This is the stealth issue in 2004, I am just wondering when it will surface.
2 posted on 01/28/2004 9:43:10 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
This is the stealth issue in 2004, I am just wondering when it will surface.

With productivity growing a 8% and the GDP growing a 4% no way the economy and job growth can keep up with the fantastic productivity.

Do the numbers...the Dims have a no loose issue and you can bet they will hammer it this election year.

3 posted on 01/28/2004 9:51:44 AM PST by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andy1114
There was a study done a few years ago, I think it was commissioned by the FairTax organization. The study found out that if corporations weren't taxed (corporations aren't really taxed anyway, they just pass the cost onto the consumer) at all or regulated as much, then businesses from all over the world would build manufacturing facilities in the United States on such a scale that we'd have a large labour shortage. This is due to the relatively high skill of labour that we have in the USA compared to other countries and also the astronomical productivity level by American workers. Amazing what freedom can do for the soul.

If government wants to create jobs, then it needs to get itself out of the way of the companies that will provide them.

4 posted on 01/28/2004 9:54:31 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy1114
Note that he says "manufacturing" jobs -- apparently he's OK with the idea that hi-tech and other non-manufacturing jobs can leave the country.
5 posted on 01/28/2004 9:57:53 AM PST by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
Another congressman nervously discovering the 'Jobs' issue close to election time. There is ONE job this guy cares about. His. Period.

The same goes for this lame administration led by Rove and gang. The come at the election cycle like the own all of 2000 votes and just need to a get a Red state or two.

They're gonna be surprised come Election day.

6 posted on 01/28/2004 10:01:53 AM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andy1114
He focuses on manufacturing jobs because that's the biggest area that the government has been able to stifle (read taxes and regulations, favorites of "liberals"). The fact is that the trend has been more and more toward services and away from manufacturing for 15 - 20 years and that's where it will continue.

I just love how the Dims will outlaw wheat, then bitch about the shortage of bread...

7 posted on 01/28/2004 10:04:21 AM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
The need to wake up now.
8 posted on 01/28/2004 10:06:01 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xrp
If government wants to create jobs, then it needs to get itself out of the way of the companies that will provide them.

As a small business owner,I've got one word for that statement.BINGO!

9 posted on 01/28/2004 10:11:24 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xrp
<<"If government wants to create jobs, then it needs to get itself out of the way of the companies that will provide them.">>

Yes, and those companies will provide them for the folks in India, China, etc., etc. I'm not just talking about manufacturing jobs but the exploding exodus of high-tech white collar jobs. I can't really fault a company for seeking cheaper labor, but if gov. wants to get involved, let it show a little patriotism and not make it so cheap for corps. to send these jobs off-shore. And, of course, we can all retrain and change our career focuses (I've done that a few times in my life) but there is a limit. The corps are only interested in the quarter to quarter bottom line for their investors (read fund managers) to keep their earnings on the up-tick. The gov. should be concerned about the eroding consumer and tax base. If we are all earning less money then, obviously, we will spend less and pay less. The medium to longer consequenses should be of concern to all. This off-shoring bubble may burst one day but the results could be pretty ugly.
10 posted on 01/28/2004 10:14:13 AM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xrp
If government wants to create jobs, then it needs to get itself out of the way of the companies that will provide them.

It will be interesting to see if the Democrats mention this as a part of the solution. Or the Republicans, for that matter.

11 posted on 01/28/2004 10:18:38 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
It is about jobs. This is the stealth issue in 2004, I am just wondering when it will surface.

It has...just under the radar of most:

TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 2004 01:13:33 AM ] NEW DELHI: The passage of the omnibus-spending Bill with a provision to ban outsourcing by the US Senate has highlighted the central role that outsourcing or more importantly the loss of American jobs will play on the forthcoming US elections.

The Senate ban is effective only on the US companies while they are executing federal projects. This would mean that firms in the US which win federal contracts can not subcontract the project to companies outside the US.

Bush unlikely to veto outsourcing ban Bill

That takes care of the Federal sector, apparently the bill outlined in this article deals with the private sector. Of course, you will hear the incessant screams of the left about the GOP being in the pocket of big corporations, but then, what's new about that?

12 posted on 01/28/2004 10:19:28 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYDave
The gov. should be concerned about the eroding consumer and tax base.

The government, the politicians running it really, seems only to be concerned in campaign money: getting re-elected. I doubt that they really care much who is providing that money, Americans or foreigners (through American sources as well as directly) as long as it keeps coming in.

13 posted on 01/28/2004 10:23:38 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Exactly, all of the Tariffs in the world is not going to stop manufacturing jobs from moving overseas. We are overtaxed and over regulated.
14 posted on 01/28/2004 10:28:07 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: andy1114
There should be NO corporate income tax. It's illogical and therefore stupid.
15 posted on 01/28/2004 10:30:38 AM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy1114
National security still ranks as the #1 issue, but illegal immigration and loss of jobs overseas are related to national security. The politicians are ignoring not one, but two elephants hiding behind the sofa. What the hell? President Bush, are you listening?
16 posted on 01/28/2004 10:33:03 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Actually, I think every company outsourcing jobs ought to have to pay a Relocation of Employment Fee, which would be the amount of lost tax revenue to the government on the job that has been moved. Otherwise, the fortunate few who still have jobs in the US will have to make up the taxes from all the millions of jobs being done in India and China which contribute nothing in the way of income taxes and Social Security taxes.
17 posted on 01/28/2004 10:36:31 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Actually, I think every company outsourcing jobs ought to have to pay a Relocation of Employment Fee, which would be the amount of lost tax revenue to the government on the job that has been moved. Otherwise, the fortunate few who still have jobs in the US will have to make up the taxes from all the millions of jobs being done in India and China which contribute nothing in the way of income taxes and Social Security taxes.

Not a bad perspective. I just don't like all the bureacracy this would entail.

18 posted on 01/28/2004 10:47:58 AM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: templar
I agree that this is a year when the pols. are not going to focus, seriously, on issues. They will just spew out sound bites that make everyone feel warm and fuzzy. The pols. are also in need of the corp. contributions (and Kerry takes them, it's not all ketchup money) and they don't want to ruffle the feathers of the corp. big-wigs. We live in a fascist state where, instead of the gov. running the corps,
the corps run the gov. I voted for Bush but won't make that mistake this time around. He is part of the problem, not the solution. He is very much in bed with corp. America and, unfortunately, so are all of the others.
19 posted on 01/28/2004 11:03:24 AM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
I've been waiting for it to surface since Big Steel started shutting down in 1980. It hasn't happened yet.
Must say I am stunned!
20 posted on 01/28/2004 11:08:30 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson