Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards Dodges 'Junk Science' Allegations
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 1/28/04 | Marc Morano

Posted on 01/29/2004 5:04:30 AM PST by kattracks

Manchester, N.H. (CNSNews.com) - Sen. John Edwards, the North Carolina Democrat who finished fourth in Tuesday's presidential primary in New Hampshire, refused to answer allegations that he had used "junk science" in part to win hugely lucrative legal judgments or settlements against the medical profession.

The outcome of those cases, many of them dealing with the debatable cause of cerebral palsy in infants, made Edwards a rich man, allowing him to self-finance a 1998 run for the U.S. Senate from North Carolina and position himself as a presidential candidate in 2004.

As CNSNews.com reported Jan. 20, Edwards won record jury verdicts and settlements by arguing that in certain cases, obstetricians and the hospitals where they practiced had been responsible for botching the treatment of women in labor and the delivery of their babies, resulting in the infants sustaining either brain damage or developing cerebral palsy.

The CNSNews.com report pointed to medical studies dating back to at least the 1980s which asserted that doctors could do very little to cause cerebral palsy during the birthing process and to two new studies in 2003 which further undermined the scientific premise of the high profile court cases won by Edwards.

Dr. Murray Goldstein, a neurologist and the medical director of the United Cerebral Palsy Research and Educational Foundation, told CNSNews.com that brain damage resulting from the techniques used in a delivery were possible, but "really unusual."

"The overwhelming majority of children that are born with developmental brain damage, the [obstetrician/gynecologist] could not have done anything about it, could not have, not at this stage of what we know," Goldstein said.

Eldon L. Boisseau of the Kansas-based firm Turner and Boisseau, specializing in defending doctors' insurance companies from medical malpractice lawsuits, said he believed "junk science" was being used by lawyers in cases similar to those Edwards argued during his legal career.

And while obstetricians were generally blameless in cerebral palsy cases according to Boisseau, he said he believed there would be more legal judgments and settlements in the future similar to those Edwards had won during his legal career.

Some of Edwards' critics had told CNSNews.com that as a trial lawyer, Edwards relied more on his verbal skills than the latest scientific evidence to persuade juries that the doctors' mistakes had been instrumental in causing the cerebral palsy in the infants.

But after speaking to his supporters Tuesday night following his fourth place finish in New Hampshire, Edwards did not want to address the allegations. His campaign spokesmen had also refused to comment on the issue prior to CNSNews.com's publication of its Jan. 20 story.

"How do you respond to allegations that trial lawyers like yourself made a lot of money off cerebral palsy cases using 'junk science,' when scientific studies show that cerebral palsy isn't caused by botched deliveries?" CNSNews.com asked Edwards Tuesday night.

Edwards did not say a word, despite two more attempts to elicit a response. His aides intervened and moved the senator along.

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; edwards; overlawyered

1 posted on 01/29/2004 5:04:30 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One America's premier con artist charlatans is Breck Girl John Edwards, who stole his millions by a combination of pure junk science ("obstetricians cause cerebral palsy"... THEY DO NOT!) and the utterly corrupt courts.

It is the rats and their shyster money men who are the healthcare problem. The money wasted on insurance fraud by these stinking rodents in $3000 suits could pay for healthcare for all who currently do no possess coverage.

2 posted on 01/29/2004 5:11:25 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
$3000 suits that would be a low estimate... $10,000 would be more reasonable.
3 posted on 01/29/2004 5:42:55 AM PST by Sinner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A lying lawyer!
Say it ain't so!!!!
4 posted on 01/29/2004 5:53:25 AM PST by Redcoat LI ("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Ah... the old "class warfare" card in politics. Let's get those rich sons o' bitches.
5 posted on 01/29/2004 5:56:18 AM PST by Lysander (Don't stand where I told you to stand. Stand where I told you to stand!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
Ah... the old "class warfare" card in politics.

Absolutely not, just destroy the criminal enterprise known as Trial Lawyer, Inc.

Massive, massive tort reform is needed to clean up the "stench from the bench."

6 posted on 01/29/2004 6:04:10 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I guess this is why most Dems think all rich people get rich through crooked means.
7 posted on 01/29/2004 6:08:06 AM PST by GigaDittos (Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember; Mo1; southernnorthcarolina; Rebelbase; mykdsmom; Constitution Day; jern; ...
allowing him to self-finance a 1998 run for the U.S. Senate from North Carolina

Then why does that campaign still owe five million dollars?

8 posted on 01/29/2004 6:08:12 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I wish somebody would attend an Edwards rally carrying an ambulance siren and let it rip and watch the guy drool.
9 posted on 01/29/2004 6:10:33 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There's a sick baby who will need lifetime care, a devestated family, and a rich doctor who's insured anyway. A lot of juries will just give the money to the families because they are going to need it and have suffered. Causation is not really a big factor. Obstetrician's malpractice insurance is largely insuring against birth defects.
10 posted on 01/29/2004 6:11:17 AM PST by gridlock (If Dean is the Anti-Bush and Clark is the Anti-Dean, does Bush=Clark?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Then why does that campaign still owe five million dollars?

Really? He is a greedy kleptomaniac! Stealing millions of dollars at every opportunity seems to be his forte!

An Edwards Presidency would make the thievery and bribery of the Clintons look like Amateur Hour.

11 posted on 01/29/2004 6:14:29 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

12 posted on 01/29/2004 6:15:55 AM PST by Constitution Day (What happens at CPAC stays at CPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
...a rich doctor who's insured anyway...

You cannot be serious.

13 posted on 01/29/2004 6:17:12 AM PST by TankerKC (My life is a Country Song.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Some of Edwards' critics had told CNSNews.com that as a trial lawyer, Edwards relied more on his verbal skills than the latest scientific evidence to persuade juries that the doctors' mistakes had been instrumental in causing the cerebral palsy in the infants.

BINGO!

14 posted on 01/29/2004 6:26:59 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Bump to the top for relevancy
15 posted on 07/06/2004 6:48:19 AM PDT by Republican Red (I actually did vote for the 87 BILLION... before I voted against it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Forget tort reform bump.


16 posted on 07/06/2004 6:00:38 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson