Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/30/2004 9:46:53 AM PST by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NorCoGOP
I hear that Kerry says that the threat from terror is greatly exaggerated and we can all relax and get back to normal.

Bush may want us to GO to Mars but it's Kerry who's already in outer space.
2 posted on 01/30/2004 9:53:25 AM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Kerry is the Barney Fife of the Senate.
3 posted on 01/30/2004 9:54:52 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
This snippet from DemocracyNow should be sent to any Dim who attack W on WMD issue

AMY GOODDMAN: Senator Kerry -- quick question. You said that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons when other nations wouldn't try. What intelligence was that based on?

JOHN KERRY: I don't know what report -- I don't know what you are talking about.

AMY GOODDMAN: You said Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons.

JOHN KERRY: When did I say that? I don't recall. I don't know.

AMY GOODDMAN: You said he was developing chemical and biological weapons.

JOHN KERRY: I never said he was developing nuclear. I believe I said --

AMY GOODDMAN: You said, why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons.

JOHN KERRY: Attempting to, because he did. He did attempt to.

AMY GOODDMAN: According to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons.

JOHN KERRY: Say it again?

AMY GOODDMAN: You said according to intelligence, Iraq has biological and chemical weapons.

JOHN KERRY: That's what we were told. Right.

AMY GOODDMAN: Is that intelligence wrong? Do you think Bush -- you made a wrong statement, then? Because Kucinich at the time was saying no credible sources were there, but you are saying --

JOHN KERRY: I'm sorry, we're going to have to do --

JEREMY SCAHILL: Amy was then told by Kerry's people to stop asking questions and the press could ask them later. But when she asked if there would be an avail after the event, press lingo for press availability, Kerry's staffers conceded that there would be none. We persisted in our questioning of Kerry on this issue.

JEREMY SCAHILL: Senator Kerry, why did you say that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction?

STAFFER: We have to get the Apollo crew in here.

JEREMY SCAHILL: Answer the question, senator Kerry. Why did you accuse Saddam of having weapons of mass destruction?

4 posted on 01/30/2004 9:56:49 AM PST by DTA (you ain't seen nothing yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I do NOT want a close race. I have seen too many of those decided by the graveyard vote and other such chicanery at which the Dems seem to excel.

On another topic, I am amused that the media are trumpeting John F'ing Kerry as a moderate. IIRC, he has a more liberal voting record than Ted Kennedy.
6 posted on 01/30/2004 10:00:49 AM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Ketchup Boy Revised

You’re a Vet from Viet Nam,
My question is which side?
You pulled ahead in Iowa,
Hope you enjoyed the ride.
Dean is toast and three dropped out,
But you don’t have a chance.
Some one else will take the lead,
New Hampshire’s your last dance.
So sit back down and shut your yap,
The party soon is over.
Underdog you called yourself,
Please do not insult rover.

Conspiracy Guy 1/21/04
7 posted on 01/30/2004 10:03:44 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (This tagline is made from 100% virtual material. Do not remove under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
All of the recent winning presidents before Bush won a huge portion of the electoral vote. The low point was Clinton's 370 in 1992. Bush won't come close to that. He needed Dean to get to about 320. He'll be under 300 now and that's no mandate in anyone's eyes. Carter's win over Ford will probably be a bigger win than Bush's over Kerry's. Dems won't feel the slightest bit beaten. They'll still filibuster and Bush will still be antsy about appoint a SCOTUS nominee-- part of the reason none of them have retired.
8 posted on 01/30/2004 10:04:38 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
He shared initials with another JFK and looked like a president

I've looked at POTUS pictures, and cannot find one he looks like at all.

How about Mr. Ed?

10 posted on 01/30/2004 10:10:49 AM PST by BigLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Very odd pic. What's he doing with his left hand?
12 posted on 01/30/2004 10:18:08 AM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP

23 posted on 01/30/2004 12:06:39 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
About a year ago, John KerryBob Dole struck me as the strongest potential challenger to President BushClinton. He was a Vietnam WW II veteran, distinguished senator and levelheaded. With KerryDole, there were no surprises. He was the Democrat's DemocratRepublican's Republican, and a safe choice to be the nominee.
24 posted on 01/30/2004 12:11:45 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson