To: eno_
Yes, but,... but, the foam we used was environmentally friendly.
3 posted on
01/31/2004 11:32:55 AM PST by
HardStarboard
(Dump Wesley Clark.....he worries me as much as Hillary!)
To: HardStarboard
"...the foam we used was environmentally friendly."
That fact gets very little emphasis in the mainstream press. The role that environmental PC culture also gets little coverage. It was not advisable to challenge environmentalism, even after it was technically permissable to use a wavier to go back to the old foam formulation.
13 posted on
02/01/2004 7:38:50 AM PST by
Truth29
To: HardStarboard
The coverup by NASA and the media of the role played by the EPA in this disaster (and the loss of the Challenger) is unconscionable.
15 posted on
02/01/2004 7:47:46 AM PST by
snopercod
(When the people are ready, a master will appear.)
To: HardStarboard
Yes, but,... but, the foam we used was environmentally friendly.
Yes, it had no freon and wouldn't contribute to the ozone hole......right?
20 posted on
02/01/2004 9:09:52 AM PST by
Gracey
(John Kerry - The Shar Pei Candidate - Hillary for VP 2004 - Be wary!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson