Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scenic Sounds
The space program uses experimental and leading edge technology. The accomplishments are truly amazing and there is no such thing as a "routine" space flight.

Arts spending can use more discretion. Again, if a private financer would face a backlash over such works, the government board members who approve controversial works should at the very least be made to defend their decisions. We don't have to finance offensive work; such work should also be public domain since we paid for it. There are plenty of world famous photos in the National Archives because the photographers were paid by FDR's WPA. They carry no copyright. NASA's space photos carry no copyright.

See if (the late) Mapplethorpe would have been willing to give some shots to the government if every t-shirt vendor, postcard manufacturer, etc. could sell the image royalty free.

154 posted on 02/02/2004 4:54:56 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
At all levels, I want government to be very careful about its spending. No exceptions!!!! ;-)
157 posted on 02/02/2004 5:00:18 PM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson