To: Blue Screen of Death
But, but.. he increased spending for the arts.I did the math on that. It works out to less than 28 cents for each of us over the next four years if the increase is renewed each year. I am willing to reimburse the 28 cents to anyone who asks. Any interested parties can just Freep me with their name and address, date of birth, Social Security number and Visa number and the 28 cents will be on its way ASAP.
25 posted on
02/02/2004 1:55:38 PM PST by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: Scenic Sounds
Theft for the arts is still theft for the arts irrespective of the amount. Not to mention unconstitutional btw. Seen in that light, its pretty "expensively" cheap.
31 posted on
02/02/2004 1:59:50 PM PST by
KantianBurke
(Principles, not blind loyalty)
To: Scenic Sounds; KantianBurke
I know you will disagree with this Scenic but it still applies as well today as it did many years ago. It is simply not
Yours to GiveI could care less if it was even half of that. It is not the responsibility of the national government
46 posted on
02/02/2004 2:08:33 PM PST by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: Scenic Sounds
"I did the math on that. It works out to less than 28 cents for each of us over the next four years if the increase is renewed each year. I am willing to reimburse the 28 cents to anyone who asks. Any interested parties can just Freep me with their name and address, date of birth, Social Security number and Visa number and the 28 cents will be on its way ASAP."
That offer was made on post #25. Any takers? LOL
Glad you posted the actual cost again. Had seen your post on another thread, was trying to find your calculations and couldn't remember your 'last' name.
168 posted on
02/02/2004 9:44:36 PM PST by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson