Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2004 12:39:09 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Aren't these companies all owned by the same parent company???

What a joke.
2 posted on 02/03/2004 12:43:01 AM PST by Gerasimov (My last tag line sucked, so now I have this one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"While AOL was the sponsor of the Super Bowl Halftime Show, we did not produce it"

While Hamas was the sponsor of the suicide bombing, we did not produce it.
3 posted on 02/03/2004 12:43:22 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Her stunt prevented AOL from streaming the halftime show online, which was part of its original deal.

she didn't show her breast till the very last seconds of the show

So how did this stop AOL from streaming the halftime show online??

5 posted on 02/03/2004 12:51:35 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Instead, its $10 million sponsorship of the halftime show and numerous commercial spots turned into a disaster because of Janet Jackson's inability to keep her clothes on, analysts said.

AOL's numerous commercial spots came a cropper because they were boring and stupid. Ms. Jackson's exposed mammary gland had nothing to do with that.

9 posted on 02/03/2004 1:13:20 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher (HAS YOUR TAGLINE BEEN BLESSED TODAY? Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I'll believe AOL cares about providing family-safe internetting when it dumps its rap radio channel. My co-worker plays it and it is filled with the most vile filth you could imagine, with the worst lines repeated ad nauseum.

Otherwise, I'd believe the SB halftime show is nothing but an extension of what they already offer - boob and all.
12 posted on 02/03/2004 1:46:22 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Some day I'll have a rock-hard body - once rigor mortis sets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
AOL is acting like a criminal who got mugged.
19 posted on 02/03/2004 4:18:45 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"AOL may complain officially, but privately, they were exchanging high-fives."

Complaining loudly and celebrating in private, just like the idiotic fat broad who spilled scalding coffee in her lap and won a lawsuit against McDonalds.

21 posted on 02/03/2004 4:27:40 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I got rid of AOL after my children were spammed by pornographic websites and began receiving email from pederasts encountered in chat rooms. I dutifully notified AOL of each instance, and forwarded the emails for their action. AOL never responded. They were too busy making money by selling our names and email addresses to the highest bidder.
22 posted on 02/03/2004 4:36:41 AM PST by PowderMonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Let's call in the Taliban!
23 posted on 02/03/2004 4:40:45 AM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
AOL has lost another customer. It is switcheroo time!
24 posted on 02/03/2004 4:43:01 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"Content was certainly part of the contract," the official said

Come on AOL, did you ever listen to the lyrics of the "performers" on your sleeze fest? Either way AOL should be sued also for putting this stuff out on prime time.
25 posted on 02/03/2004 4:43:20 AM PST by FreedomGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Why? They didn't get a "happy ending"?
26 posted on 02/03/2004 4:51:08 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bttt
31 posted on 02/03/2004 5:27:03 AM PST by Guenevere (..., .Press on toward the goal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
AOL = Areole On Line
33 posted on 02/03/2004 5:30:23 AM PST by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Her stunt prevented AOL from streaming the halftime show online, which was part of its original deal.

It stunk with or without the boob. No deal.

36 posted on 02/03/2004 8:19:38 AM PST by dubyagee (The White House spending spree is making me crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Thread #42 in the ongoing nipplegate saga.

Check the keyword nipplegate for all the latest coverage in this developing story...
41 posted on 02/03/2004 9:50:48 AM PST by flashbunny ("Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
These are crocodile tears, if there ever were any. The stunt could only have increased the level of the exposure for which they were striving, by increasing the ripple effect, i.e. people talking about it the next day.

The function of this statement, now, is to make sure that the public associates AOL with the event; they were probably nervous that otherwise what they paid for might have upstaged the product.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site.

44 posted on 02/03/2004 12:50:42 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson